2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-96885-4_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the Supercritical Fluid Extraction (SFE) on Food Bioactives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disadvantage of lower SFE yields is often countered by the addition of a cosolvent. Ethanol, a safe and green solvent, is usually employed as a cosolvent in typically low concentrations during SFE [54,55]. For this reason, the addition of 10% w/w ethanol was performed during SFE under the optimum extraction conditions found in Section 3.3.2.…”
Section: Effect Of Cosolventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage of lower SFE yields is often countered by the addition of a cosolvent. Ethanol, a safe and green solvent, is usually employed as a cosolvent in typically low concentrations during SFE [54,55]. For this reason, the addition of 10% w/w ethanol was performed during SFE under the optimum extraction conditions found in Section 3.3.2.…”
Section: Effect Of Cosolventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique primarily leverages supercritical fluids, most commonly carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), due to its moderate critical temperature and pressure, making it suitable for extracting heat-sensitive biological molecules like proteins without denaturing them (Figure 7). The mechanism begins when CO 2 is pressurised and heated above its critical point, exhibiting unique properties of gases and liquids [72]. At this supercritical state, CO 2 has a gas-like diffusivity and viscosity and a liquid-like density, enabling it to penetrate cellular structures more effectively than either state alone.…”
Section: Supercritical Fluid Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%