1979
DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(79)90591-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of the magnetic fields on frog sciatic nerve

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports of significant magnetic field effects on the amplitude and conduction velocity of frog sciatic nerves have been presented by Reno (1969) and Edelman et al (1979). Reno observed that when the sciatic nerve axis was oriented parallel to a 1.16-T field, the impulse conduction velocity exhibited a measurable change after 5 min of exposure, and rose 30% above the control value by 10 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous reports of significant magnetic field effects on the amplitude and conduction velocity of frog sciatic nerves have been presented by Reno (1969) and Edelman et al (1979). Reno observed that when the sciatic nerve axis was oriented parallel to a 1.16-T field, the impulse conduction velocity exhibited a measurable change after 5 min of exposure, and rose 30% above the control value by 10 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Schwartz (1978) later reported that the conduction velocity of isolated lobster circumesophageal nerve was unaffected by a 1.2-T field applied in either a parallel or perpendicular orientation. Edelman et al (1979) observed no effect of parallel magnetic fields on the amplitude of frog sciatic nerve action potentials. However, when the nerve was placed in a perpendicular configuration in fields ranging from 0.2-0.6 T, a time-dependent increase in action potential amplitude was observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, the results reported by Edelman et al,38 like those of Reno,37 are fully consistent with thermal effects associated with the dissipation of heat from electromagnet coils under conditions where no provision is made for rigorous temperature regulation within the magnet gap. It should also be noted that Edelman et al 38 used electrical stimuli that produced submaximal action potentials with amplitudes of 7-10 mV. As discussed above, Gaffey and Tenforde 34 have demonstrated that such submaximal action potentials are extremely temperature sensitive.…”
Section: Nervous Systemmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…37,38 In studies with intact frog sciatic nerves, Ren0 37 found that the application of a homogeneous 1.16-T field oriented parallel to the nerve axis led to a measurable increase in the impulse conduction velocity beginning after approximately 5 min of exposure. After 20 min in the field, the nerve, conduction velocity r~ached a level that was 30% above the pre-exposure control value.…”
Section: Nervous Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation