2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of survey strategy and interpolation model on DEM quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
178
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
178
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of the DEM is basically a function of the accuracy of individual survey points, field survey strategy and the method of interpolation (Heritage et al 2009). The most popular ways to create DEM models are the regular grid surface (Grid) and triangulated irregular network (TIN) (El-Sheimy et al 2005).…”
Section: Lake Suskie Dem Generation and Morphometry Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the DEM is basically a function of the accuracy of individual survey points, field survey strategy and the method of interpolation (Heritage et al 2009). The most popular ways to create DEM models are the regular grid surface (Grid) and triangulated irregular network (TIN) (El-Sheimy et al 2005).…”
Section: Lake Suskie Dem Generation and Morphometry Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coarseness obviously impedes the simulation of fine-scale GSI driven by morphological features that are poorly or not captured by a DEM. For example, breaks-in-slope of the stream surface are major drivers of hyporheic exchange, yet these areas are generally associated with the largest errors in DEMs (Heritage et al 2009;Schäppi et al 2010). …”
Section: Channel-representation Issues the Digital Elevation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may be time consuming or expensive, yet they favor repeatability and some consistency between different datasets. Potential limitations include the high data volume, which must be reduced to a manageable size (Mandlburger et al 2009), and the poor representation of hydraulically significant steep slopes, despite seemingly small sampling intervals (Heritage et al 2009). …”
Section: Generating a Demmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of sampling technique on topographic datasets was tested by Heritage et al (2009). However, it is essential to determine the effect of resampling techniques on hydraulic variables.…”
Section: Comparison Of Resampling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies may look into the application of the rating relationships developed between vertical elevation errors and spatial variability by Heritage et al (2009).…”
Section: Future Work and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%