2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c06142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Surfactant and Weak-Alkali Concentrations on the Stability of O/W Emulsion in an Alkali-Surfactant–Polymer Compound System

Abstract: Emulsions have emerged as advanced materials for wide industrial applications because of their unique properties. In the actual application in oilfields, emulsions can significantly enhance oil recovery. In the present study, the stability test shows that the concentrations of a surfactant and alkali and salinity have a great influence on the stability of the emulsion, but the addition of excessive chemical agents may adversely affect the emulsion stability. The addition of excessive alkali causes the phase in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, at a shear rate of 250 s –1 , the dependence of viscosity on the concentration of CTAB becomes minor. The pseudoplastic rheological behavior of the emulsion observed at the optimum CTAB amount (i.e., 1 g) may be due to the “micelle solubilization” as explained before by Zhang et al At an amount less than the optimum value, the stability (which is directly related to the rheological behavior) increases steadily due to the increase in the surfactant molecules adsorbed to the interface between the two phases forming the emulsion. However, at a critical surfactant amount (1 g in this case), the surfactant may form micelles that have a solubilization tendency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…That is, at a shear rate of 250 s –1 , the dependence of viscosity on the concentration of CTAB becomes minor. The pseudoplastic rheological behavior of the emulsion observed at the optimum CTAB amount (i.e., 1 g) may be due to the “micelle solubilization” as explained before by Zhang et al At an amount less than the optimum value, the stability (which is directly related to the rheological behavior) increases steadily due to the increase in the surfactant molecules adsorbed to the interface between the two phases forming the emulsion. However, at a critical surfactant amount (1 g in this case), the surfactant may form micelles that have a solubilization tendency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…49 The previous experiments and research indicated that the HN shell largely prevents drug release from drug-loaded NPs. 26 Thus, HAase was applied in the OH release experiment to degrade HN and release OH. When MB was treated with H 2 O 2 and H 2 O 2 + HAase + HN@Cu-MOF, almost no changes were observed in the absorption of MB in comparison with pure MB solution under the same circumstances (Fig.…”
Section: Detection Of Oh Releasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Accordingly, Cu 2+ is a frequently applied transition metal in CDT, which can consume the extra GSH generated by tumor cells to produce Cu + , thus carrying out a Fenton-like reaction, increasing oxidative stress in cells and decreasing the clearance of OH. [25][26][27][28] In addition, Cu 2+ is easily oxidized into Cu + in the weakly acidic TEM, which can be approximately 160-times faster than that of Fe 2+ . 29,30 Inspired by this, Cu 2+ -doped MOFs have been designed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LG SL) of the surface towards the two phases: the wetting phase can pass through the porous media and accumulate at the other side, while the non-wetting phase suffers retention [252]. As surfactants reduce interfacial tension, this driving force diminishes with their increasing concentration [256]. Another influencing factors on the effectivity of separation are the drop size of the dispersed phase and the pore diameter.…”
Section: Oil-water Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%