2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.10.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of spine morphology on intervertebral disc loads and stresses in asymptomatic adults: implications for the ideal spine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
114
1
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
7
114
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the two largest modes of variation found here, 'curviness' (M1) and 'evenness' (M2), describe a similar variation to that previously described [1,3]. Although there is a large variation in spinal shapes between individuals [1,3,[24][25][26], these two modes capture most of this variation and account for between 84 % [1], 91 % [3] and, in this study, 90 % of the total variance. The factors that may underpin the variation in spinal shapes between individuals and possible biomechanical and clinical implications have been discussed previously [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, the two largest modes of variation found here, 'curviness' (M1) and 'evenness' (M2), describe a similar variation to that previously described [1,3]. Although there is a large variation in spinal shapes between individuals [1,3,[24][25][26], these two modes capture most of this variation and account for between 84 % [1], 91 % [3] and, in this study, 90 % of the total variance. The factors that may underpin the variation in spinal shapes between individuals and possible biomechanical and clinical implications have been discussed previously [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Since the barycentremetric study by Duval-Beaupere et al, 6 researchers have attempted to further study the impact of sagittal plane alignment on biomechanical loads and degenerative changes of the spine. 5,8,12,[17][18][19] Several methods have been developed to identify the location the center of gravity in the context of spine-related research. In 1992, Duval-Beaupere et al described a method 6 based on a gamma-ray scanner prototype that was combined with lateral radiography.…”
Section: Relationship Between Spinopelvic and Compensatory Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior musculoskeletal models have incorporated the thorax as a single rigid segment [2], have neglected the mechanical contribution of the ribs and sternum [2][3][4][5], or have lacked an anatomically realistic model of the rib cage [6], making them unsuitable for predicting thoracic skeletal and muscular loading. A few prior models included an articulated thoracic spine, but not the rib cage or the detailed thoracic musculature [3,5,[7][8][9]. In addition, these prior models were not validated against in vivo measures of spine and trunk muscle loading, and were only used to assess vertebral loading during a neutral standing posture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%