Influence of Spatial Scale on Structure of Soil Bacterial Communities across an Arctic Landscape

Abstract

Bacterial community composition is largely influenced by environmental factors, and this applies to the Arctic region. However, little is known about the role of spatial factors in structuring such communities. In this study, we evaluated the influence of spatial scale on bacterial community structure across an Arctic landscape. Our results showed that spatial factors accounted for approximately 10% of the variation at the landscape scale, equivalent to observations across the whole Arctic region, suggesting that while the role and magnitude of other processes involved in community structure may vary, the role of dispersal may be stable globally in the region. We assessed dispersal limitation by identifying the spatial autocorrelation distance, standing at approximately 60 m, which would be required in order to obtain fully independent samples and may inform future sampling strategies in the region. Finally, indicator taxa with strong statistical correlations with environment variables were identified. However, we showed that these strong taxa-environment associations may not always be reflected in the geographical distribution of these taxa. IMPORTANCE The significance of this study is threefold. It investigated the influence of spatial scale on the soil bacterial community composition across a typical Arctic landscape and demonstrated that conclusions reached when examining the influence of specific environmental variables on bacterial community composition are dependent upon the spatial scales over which they are investigated. This study identified a dispersal limitation (spatial autocorrelation) distance of approximately 60 m, required to obtain samples with fully independent bacterial communities, and therefore, should serve to inform future sampling strategies in the region and potentially elsewhere. The work also showed that strong taxa-environment statistical associations may not be reflected in the observed landscape distribution of the indicator taxa.

Soil microorganisms and methane emissions in response to short-term warming field incubation in Svalbard

“…However, due to a series of influences, such as vegetation type, soil water content, and soil depth, the microbial composition at different sampling sites showed obvious differences after long-term domestication (Son and Lee, 2022). These findings also agree with results from other Arctic tundra climate change experiments showing a strong response of soil microbial communities to vegetation types and spatial scale (Campbell et al, 2010;Malard et al, 2021).…”

Analysis of soil bacterial communities and physicochemical properties associated with Fusarium wilt disease of banana in Malaysia

“…Intensive sampling of local environments increases the chances of detecting rare OTUs due to their low local abundance, habitat specificity, or restricted geographic spread, which can disproportionately influence ecosystem processes. Malard et al 30 also highlight the importance of investigating different spatial scales, as drivers at the global scale may not necessarily be the same across the landscape of interest. The soil samples (RH, RI, BH, and BI) from the same banana farm planted with the local susceptible variety, cv.…”

The environmental niche of soil bacterial, archaeal, fungal and protist communities differ along edaphic and topoclimatic gradients in the Alps

“…Overall, these results highlight the importance not only of cross kingdom comparisons but also of the scale of investigation -local or global [81,82]. We also note that some of the remaining unexplained variance may result from other unmeasured environmental variables such as microclimates [83] or other biotic interactions, either between these four groups investigated, with plants [50], or with other soil organisms such as arthropods, rotifers or nematodes [84][85][86].…”