2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-015-0665-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Sokal, Hasford, EUTOS scores and pharmacogenetic factors on the complete cytogenetic response at 1 year in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib

Abstract: Imatinib mesylate is currently considered the first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Sokal, Hasford and EUTOS are the three major risk categorization scores available for CML patients. The present study aimed to explore the influence of three risk score, genetic polymorphisms of ABCB1, OCT1, ABCG2 and trough level concentration on complete cytogenetic response at 1 year and overall survival. The mean time period of follow-up was 53.05 months, and the overall survival was 94.6%. The Sokal scor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, there was as high as 95.5% of patients in high-risk group (Sokal scoring system) and 68.2% of patients in high-risk group (Hasford scoring system) in CML-T group, and these patients all received imatinib therapy after definite diagnosis, according to the criterion of Chinese guidelines for CML 16. At present, it was reported that the Sokal and Hasford scoring systems were significantly associated with the overall survival of CML-chronic phase patients treated with imatinib ( P =0.014 and 0.016, respectively) 17. Yahng et al18 also reported that all three high-risk groups (Sokal, Hasford and EUTOS) showed significantly lower incidence of both Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) and MMR compared to low-risk groups; therefore, we considered that the poor EFS of patients in CML-T group may be involved with a higher proportion of patients with high risk in Sokal and Hasford scoring systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In this study, there was as high as 95.5% of patients in high-risk group (Sokal scoring system) and 68.2% of patients in high-risk group (Hasford scoring system) in CML-T group, and these patients all received imatinib therapy after definite diagnosis, according to the criterion of Chinese guidelines for CML 16. At present, it was reported that the Sokal and Hasford scoring systems were significantly associated with the overall survival of CML-chronic phase patients treated with imatinib ( P =0.014 and 0.016, respectively) 17. Yahng et al18 also reported that all three high-risk groups (Sokal, Hasford and EUTOS) showed significantly lower incidence of both Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) and MMR compared to low-risk groups; therefore, we considered that the poor EFS of patients in CML-T group may be involved with a higher proportion of patients with high risk in Sokal and Hasford scoring systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…11 The above scores were widely implemented to evaluate treatment response and long-term outcome of CML patients receiving defined treatment. 6,[12][13][14][15] However, there lacked the risk prediction in disease-specific mortality. In 2016, the EUTOS long-term survival (ELTS) score was proposed in a clinical study enrolling a cohort of 2290 imatinib-treated patients with chronic-phase CML (CML-CP) diagnosed between 2002 and 2006 and showed a better ability to determine the probability of dying from CML.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As more becomes known regarding how genetics affects responses to dasatinib, pharmacogenomics may be used in the future to prescribe individualized doses. For example, variations in the P‐glycoprotein allele ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1 ( ABCB1 ) affected the transport of dasatinib, imatinib, and nilotinib into cells, and thus have implications for efficacy at a given dose . Another study examined the influence of genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1 and ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 2 ( ABCG2 ) (which help to confer multidrug resistance), the transcription factor Oct1, risk scores (Sokal, European Treatment and Outcome Study [EUTOS], and Hasford), and trough concentrations of imatinib on CCyR .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…55 Another study examined the influence of genetic polymorphisms in ABCB1 and ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2) (which help to confer multidrug resistance), the transcription factor Oct1, risk scores (Sokal, European Treatment and Outcome Study [EUTOS], and Hasford), and trough concentrations of imatinib on CCyR. 56 The investigators found that a specific variant in ABCG2 correlated with increased CCyR and thus increased survival. 56 Answers to these questions and others will come from prospective clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation