Purpose Azacitidine is standard, first-line therapy in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Whether azacitidine-based combinations with lenalidomide or vorinostat produce superior overall response rates (ORRs) to azacitidine is not known. Patients and Methods North American Intergroup Study S1117 is a phase II/III trial that randomly assigned patients with higher-risk MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) 1:1:1 to azacitidine (75 mg/m/day on days 1 to 7 of a 28-day cycle); azacitidine plus lenalidomide (10 mg/day on days 1 to 21); or azacitidine plus vorinostat (300 mg twice daily on days 3 to 9). The primary phase II end point was improved ORR. Results Of 277 patients from 90 centers, 92 received azacitidine, 93 received azacitidine plus lenalidomide, and 92 received azacitidine plus vorinostat. Median age was 70 years (range, 28 to 93 years), 85 patients (31%) were female, and 53 patients (19%) had CMML. Serious adverse events were similar across arms, although combination-arm patients were more likely to undergo nonprotocol-defined dose modifications ( P < .001).With a median follow-up of 23 months (range, 1 to 43 months), the ORR was 38% for patients receiving azacitidine, 49% for azacitidine plus lenalidomide ( P = .14 v azacitidine), and 27% for azacitidine plus vorinostat ( P = .16 v azacitidine). For patients with CMML, ORR was higher for azacitidine plus lenalidomide versus azacitidine (68% v 28%, P = .02) but similar for all arms across cytogenetic subgroups, as was remission duration and overall survival. ORR was higher with mutations in DNMT3A and lower for SRSF2, whereas ORR duration improved with fewer mutations. Lenalidomide dose reduction was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.30; P = .05). Conclusion Patients with higher-risk MDS treated with azacitidine-based combinations had similar ORR to azacitidine monotherapy, although patients with CMML benefitted from azacitidine plus lenalidomide. The efficacy of combination regimens may have been affected by dose modifications.
A recent preclinical study suggested that imatinib may be cardiotoxic in some patients. We reviewed all reported serious adverse events of cardiac adverse events occurring in patients on clinical trials involving imatinib. Among 1276 patients enrolled, 22 (1.7%) were identified as having symptoms that could be attributed to systolic heart failure. Imatinib therapy as a causal factor of CHF is uncommon, mainly seen in elderly patients with preexisting cardiac conditions. Patients with previous cardiac history should be monitored closely and treated aggressively with standard medical therapy, including diuretics, if they develop symptoms suggestive of heart failure.
The rapid increase in incidence of malignant melanoma has not been associated with better therapeutic options over the years. Single-agent chemotherapy or immunotherapy remain the treatments of choice when systemic therapy is offered. Dacarbazine (DTIC) is the chemotherapy of choice with a response rate of 16%. Other chemotherapies, including cisplatinum, paclitaxel, docetaxel and the DTIC analogue temozolomide, have shown activity in this disease. Based on their single-agent activity, several combination chemotherapies have been investigated with preliminary results that appeared promising. However, in randomized phase III trials the two most active chemotherapy combination regimens, cisplatin, vinblastine, and DTIC (CVD) and the Dartmouth regimen (DTIC, cisplatin, bischloroethylnitrosourea , and tamoxifen), did not prove to be superior to single-agent DTIC for overall survival. Immunotherapy with either interleukin (IL)-2 or interferon (IFN) has demonstrated response rates of 10% to 15% in appropriately selected patients. In patients who achieve a complete response, responses can be of greater durability than those with chemotherapy. However, IL-2 and IFN administration are associated with multiple side effects, and only physicians experienced in the management of such therapies should administer them. The potential benefit of combining chemotherapy with immunotherapy has led to multiple phase II trials of biochemotherapy that appeared to be associated with higher response rates and longer median survivals. However, several phase III trials have been completed that have not consistently demonstrated an improvement in either response rates or overall survival, and these approaches to therapy cannot be routinely recommended outside the context of a clinical trial. The surgical resection of isolated metastatic disease has demonstrated an important palliative benefit in those patients who present with solitary single-organ disease with the exception of the liver. Radiation has an important role in the palliative management of brain metastasis and symptomatic bony metastasis. Both stereotactic radiosurgery and whole brain radiotherapy have been used alone and in combination to benefit patients in this troubling clinical circumstance. Isolated limb perfusion and a newer technique, isolated limb infusion have demonstrated high response rates for those uncommon patients who develop recurrent disease isolated to a limb. In our opinion, if complete metastasectomy is not feasible and in the absence of brain metastases, single-agent IL-2 is a good initial treatment choice in appropriately selected patients. Single-agent chemotherapy with DTIC is the treatment of choice for patients who are not candidates for IL-2. Adoptive immunotherapy combining nonmyeloablative chemotherapy with high-dose IL-2 is a potentially promising therapeutic strategy under investigation. Targeted therapy is also an area of promising development as single agents, in combination, and combined with chemotherapy. The latter will be the focus of at lea...
Purpose The clinical relevance of targeting RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, activated in 70-80% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, is unknown. Experimental Design Selumetinib is an oral small molecule inhibitor of MEK1/2 kinase. Forty-seven patients with relapsed/refractory AML or ≥60 years old with untreated AML were enrolled on a phase II study. Patients were stratified by FLT3 ITD mutation status. The primary endpoint was response rate (complete, partial and minor). Leukemia cells were analyzed for ERK and mTOR phosphorylation. Results Common drug-related toxicities were grade I-II diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, vomiting and skin rash. In the FLT3 wild type cohort, 6/36 (17%) patients had a response [1 partial response, 3 minor responses, 2 unconfirmed minor responses (uMR)]. No patient with FLT3 ITD responded. NRAS and KRAS mutations were detected in 7% and 2% patients, respectively. The sole patient with KRAS mutation had uMR with hematologic improvement in platelets. Baseline p-ERK activation was observed in 85% of patients analyzed but did not correlate with a response. A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs3733542 in exon 18 of KIT gene was detected in significantly higher number of patients with response/stable disease compared with non-responders (60% vs 23%; p=0.027). Conclusion Selumetinib is associated with modest single agent antileukemic activity in advanced AML. However, given its favorable toxicity profile, combination with drugs that target other signaling pathways in AML should be considered. The potential association of SNP rs3733542 in exon 18 of KIT gene with antileukemic activity of selumetinib is intriguing, but will require validation in larger trials.
Background In the COMFORT-I study, the Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib provided significant reductions in splenomegaly, improvements in myelofibrosis (MF)-related symptoms, and a survival advantage relative to placebo in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF. This post-hoc analysis assessed the effects of ruxolitinib treatment on measures of metabolic and nutritional status. Patients and Methods Patients were randomized to receive ruxolitinib (n = 155; 15 or 20 mg twice a day for patients with baseline platelet counts of 100–200 × 109/L or > 200 × 109/L, respectively) or placebo (n = 154). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a ≥ 35% spleen volume reduction from baseline to week 24. A secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥ 50% improvement in Total Symptom Score (TSS) from baseline to week 24, measured by the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form v2.0. Weight, cholesterol, and albumin were measured at specified time points throughout the study. Results Compared with placebo, ruxolitinib treatment was associated with increased weight (mean change: +3.9 kg vs. −1.9 kg), total cholesterol (mean percentage change: +26.4% vs. −3.3%), and albumin levels (mean percentage change: +5.8% vs. −1.7%) at week 24; sustained improvements were observed with longer-term ruxolitinib therapy. Relative to placebo, increases in mean weight, total cholesterol, and albumin levels were observed with ruxolitinib treatment regardless of the degree of spleen volume and TSS reductions at 24 weeks. Conclusion Treatment with ruxolitinib improved measures of metabolic and nutritional status of patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF.
IMPORTANCETyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been associated with improved survival of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) but are also associated with adverse effects, especially fatigue and diarrhea. Discontinuation of TKIs is safe and is associated with the successful achievement of treatment-free remission (TFR) for some patients.OBJECTIVE To evaluate molecular recurrence (MRec) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after TKI discontinuation for US patients with CML. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThe Life After Stopping TKIs (LAST) study was a prospective single-group nonrandomized clinical trial that enrolled 172 patients from 14 US academic medical centers from December 18, 2014, to December 12, 2016, with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Participants were adults with chronic-phase CML whose disease was well controlled with imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, or bosutinib. Statistical analysis was performed from August 13, 2019, to March 23, 2020. INTERVENTION Discontinuation of TKIs.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Molecular recurrence, defined as loss of major molecular response (BCR-ABL1 International Scale ratio >0.1%) by central laboratory testing, and PROs (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System computerized adaptive tests) were monitored. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was performed on samples with undetectable BCR-ABL1 by standard real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR). RESULTSOf 172 patients, 89 were women (51.7%), and the median age was 60 years (range, 21-86 years). Of 171 patients evaluable for molecular analysis, 112 (65.5%) stayed in major molecular response, and 104 (60.8%) achieved TFR. Undetectable BCR-ABL1 by either ddPCR or RQ-PCR at the time of TKI discontinuation (hazard ratio, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.99-6.50; P < .001) and at 3 months (hazard ratio, 5.86; 95% CI, 3.07-11.1; P < .001) was independently associated with MRec. Molecular recurrence for patients with detectable BCR-ABL1 by RQ-PCR was 50.0% (14 of 28), undetectable BCR-ABL1 by RQ-PCR but detectable by ddPCR was 64.3% (36 of 56), and undetectable BCR-ABL1 by both ddPCR and RQ-PCR was 10.3% (9 of 87) (P Յ .001). Of the 112 patients in TFR at 12 months, 90 (80.4%) had a clinically meaningful improvement in fatigue, 39 (34.8%) had a clinically meaningful improvement in depression, 98 (87.5%) had a clinically meaningful improvement in diarrhea, 24 (21.4%) had a clinically meaningful improvement in sleep disturbance, and 5 (4.5%) had a clinically meaningful improvement in pain interference. Restarting a TKI resulted in worsening of PROs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this study, TKI discontinuation was safe, and 60.8% of patients remained in TFR. Discontinuation of TKIs was associated with improvements in PROs. These findings should assist patients and physicians in their decision-making regarding discontinuation of TKIs. Detectable BCR-ABL1 by RQ-PCR or ddPCR at the time of TKI discontinuation was associated with higher risk of MRec; clinical application of this finding should be c...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.