Concurrent measurements of evaporation, leaf conductance, irradiance, leaf water potential, and osmotic potential of maize (Zea mays L. cv. Pa6O2A) in soil at either high or low soil water potential were compared at several hours on two consecutive days in July. Hourly evaporation, measured on two weighing lysimeters, was similar until 1000 hours Eastern Standard Time, but thereafter evaporation from the maize in the dry soil was always less than that in the wet soil; before noon it was 62 % and by midafternoon, only 35 % of that in the wet soil. The leaf water potential, measured with a pressure chamber, was between -1.2 and -2.5 bars and between -6.8 and -8 bars at sunrise (about 0530 hours Eastern Standard Time) in the plants in the wet and dry soil, respectively, but decreased quickly to between -8 and -13 bars in the plants in the wet soil and to less than -15 bars in the plants in the dry soil by 1100 to 1230 hours Eastern Standard Time. At this time, the leaf conductance of all leaves was less than 0.1 cm sec in the maize in the dry soil, whereas the conductance was 0.3 to 0.4 cm sec-' in the leaves near (15), and previous stress history (10). Also, the development of plant water stress is influenced by aerial environment as well as the soil water status. Thus the development of stress and stomatal behavior in a species at high and low soil water potentials, using the data presented in the previous studies, is not a rigorous comparison since the data at the two soil potentials were obtained on different dates and even in different years.In the present study, the stomatal behavior, plant water stress and E of maize in soil at low and high water potentials have been compared over the same period of time and under the same meteorological conditions on plants at the same stage of development. The direct comparison of stomatal behavior and development of plant water stress of plants in moist and dry soil enabled the role of leaf turgor on stomatal behavior to be assessed and the concurrent measurement of E enabled the role of stomatal conductance on E to be evaluated.