1963
DOI: 10.2307/1933022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Small Plot Size and Shape on Range Herbage Production Estimates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is well documented in studies estimating yield (e.g. Kalamakar 1932;Justesen 1932;Van Dyne et al 1963), abundance (Clapham 1932), and various forest parameters (Hasel 1938;Bormann 1953;Freese 1961).…”
Section: Univariate Estimationmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is well documented in studies estimating yield (e.g. Kalamakar 1932;Justesen 1932;Van Dyne et al 1963), abundance (Clapham 1932), and various forest parameters (Hasel 1938;Bormann 1953;Freese 1961).…”
Section: Univariate Estimationmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Many plant species show a clumped pattern, however, and as a consequence plot size determination will be important in minimizing the sampling variance. Studies reporting on the effect of plot size on precision include Freese (1961), Van Dyne et al (1963), Wiegert (1967), andRam Babu et al (1981).…”
Section: Univariate Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perimeter: area ratios also decrease as quadrat size increases. Van Dyne et al (1963) presented data indicating a positive bias in herbage weight associated with increasing perimeter: area ratios on several bunchgrass ranges in Montana. However, statistical and time efficiency must also be considered in selecting an optimum quadrat.…”
Section: Direct Harvest Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The choice of sampler size is important because it may affect both the accuracy and precision of invertebrate ppulation estimates. Smdl smplers are thought to yield overestimates of variables such as plant biomass due to edge effects (Hanson 1930;Sufiatme 1947;Hendisks % 956;Wiegerl1962;Van Dyne et al .1963), while large samplers yield higher precision for the same level of replication (Smith 1938;Pechanec and Stewart 1948). Many ecologists have used large samplers to decrease smpling variability (Green 1979, p. 39), while other researchers have suggested that small samplers are the most cost effective (Smith 1938;Pechanec and Stewart 1940;Ursic and M c C l u r b 1959;Downing 1979;Green 1979, p. 38-39;John et d. 1980).…”
Section: (J7956)mentioning
confidence: 99%