1997
DOI: 10.1007/s003480050050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of roughness on attachment line boundary layer transition in hypersonic flow

Abstract: Attachment line boundary layer transition on swept cylinders is studied in a low enthalpy hypersonic wind tunnel at M :7.14. Sweep angles of 60°and 70°are used and transition is detected by means of heat flux measurements. The influence on attachment line transition of single 2D-roughness elements, in the form of tripwires or slots, as well as 3D obstacles is determined and the results are analyzed with respect to Poll's criterion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39 Results show that the data are generally in agreement with the correlation obtained by Creel A larger body of data exists regarding 2D roughness, usually trip wires applied around the leading edge. Figure 15 compares 2D tape strip data for HIFiRE-5 to other transition data from 2D trips on cylinders by Murakami et al, 40 Benard et al, 41 and Da Costa, as cited in Benard. Data with arrows represent bounding values only.…”
Section: A Discrete Roughness Correlations For the Frustummentioning
confidence: 97%
“…39 Results show that the data are generally in agreement with the correlation obtained by Creel A larger body of data exists regarding 2D roughness, usually trip wires applied around the leading edge. Figure 15 compares 2D tape strip data for HIFiRE-5 to other transition data from 2D trips on cylinders by Murakami et al, 40 Benard et al, 41 and Da Costa, as cited in Benard. Data with arrows represent bounding values only.…”
Section: A Discrete Roughness Correlations For the Frustummentioning
confidence: 97%
“…al. 16 gives a good summary of the literature in this area. Creel et al, 17 studied these ows in the low-disturbancesupersonic wind tunnel at NASA Langley Research Center.…”
Section: Attachment Line Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the collection of pairs ðR Ã tr1 ; kÞ for all the locations along the attachment-line, it appears that the threshold of transition onset does not vary appreciably downstream of the source of disturbance [20]. However, the transitional extent, k, changes quickly downstream of the roughness element and tends to reach an quasi-asymptotic value of k % 10 for this particular case (Fig.…”
Section: Transitional Regime Modelingmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This would suggest that transition cannot happen suddenly, even for quasi-asymptotic conditions. For R Ã tr1 % 250, which is the transition threshold for bypass configurations proposed in [19] by using PollÕs approximation and since checked numerous times [20], a good approximation of the transitional extent could be deduced:…”
Section: Transitional Regime Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation