Influence of Psychological Perspectives and Demographics on Drivers’ Valuation of Road Accidents: A Combination of Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Preference Heterogeneity Model

Abstract

Property damage and loss from road traffic accidents are a major concern in developing countries; thus, studies on accident damage in such countries may include more latent factors. This study aims to examine the effect of psychological perspectives and sociodemographic status on drivers’ willingness-to-pay (WTP) for road accident risk reduction, using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the random parameters multinomial logit model with heterogeneity in means and variances (RPMNLHMV). The CFA results from interviews with 1650 car drivers in Thailand demonstrate that concepts of the theory of planned behavior and health access process approach are key factors for describing drivers’ behavioral intention and WTP. The RPMNLHMV results indicate that drivers’ demographics affected drivers’ WTP to reduce road accidents, and psychological perspectives were also found to have an influence on WTP. The results also reveal unobserved characteristics that could affect drivers’ WTP. The study concludes that ignoring unobserved heterogeneity in studies on WTP to reduce road accidents can lead to biased results and neglect important influential factors. The methodological approaches applied herein offer another layer of insight into unobserved characteristics in road accident valuation. These findings could be used to provide relevant authorities practical insights for policy development on road accident mitigation and road safety education programs in accordance with drivers’ characteristics.

Measurement Model for Determining the Disparity Factors of Intercity Railway Transportation

“…Additionally, EFA results can reduce observed variables by creating new variables in the form of common factors [72]. Therefore, researchers often employ this method when there is no well-established theory regarding the relationships among measurement components [73,74].…”

Investigating Parents’ Attitudes towards the Use of Child Restraint Systems by Comparing Non-Users and User Parents

“…The main advantage is that a concept-based theory can be analytically tested and describes how various measured items represent psychological, sociological, and business measures. When CFA results are paired with construct validity tests, researchers can improve their understanding on the quality of the measurements [29,35,36]. According to CFA model development, it initially uses the observed variables to indicate the latent variables based on the result of the EFA (initially called Model 1).…”

Contributing factors to near-miss experiences of motorcyclists in Thailand: A random parameter probit model approach

“…In cases involving drivers operating different types of vehicles, researchers often turn to naturalistic methods [ 3 ] due to their capability to identify hazardous behaviors influencing near-miss situations and to identify near-miss incidents themselves. Additionally, when analyzing naturalistic data, it is crucial to account for unobserved heterogeneity in individual observations [ 22 , 57 ] This approach contributes to a deeper understanding of the relationship between various factors and the characteristics of near-miss incidents.…”