2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Prosthetic Design on Squeaking After Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a higher incidence of subsidence has been reported particularly in male patients [20], as well as an association with the problem of squeaking with ceramicon-ceramic bearings [41]. More importantly, it was the impression of one of us that some of the stems were subsiding early on, with some patients requiring revision surgery for aseptic loosening with no grossly identifiable surgical deficiencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a higher incidence of subsidence has been reported particularly in male patients [20], as well as an association with the problem of squeaking with ceramicon-ceramic bearings [41]. More importantly, it was the impression of one of us that some of the stems were subsiding early on, with some patients requiring revision surgery for aseptic loosening with no grossly identifiable surgical deficiencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an audible sound that emanates from the hip with movement [29]. It has been reported to have an incidence rate of 2.4%, 36% and 4.2% in different studies when Acolade femoral stems are excluded (a stem showing higher incidence of squeaking related to design) [29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, published investigations began to report the phenomenon of noise associated with hard-on-hard bearings [1,2,8,14,24]. The cause of noise generation in hardon-hard bearings is an area of much debate, because some studies have pointed toward component design [30,31], others have reported decreased acetabular inclination and anteversion to be risk factors in CoC implants [24], whereas increased acetabular inclination has been noted as a risk factor in MoM implants [4]. Additional potential causes include loss of bearing surface lubrication [7,32] and femoral component neck geometry [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%