2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Midterm Outcomes of the Recently FDA Approved Ceramic on Ceramic Bearing in Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients Under 65Years of Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, we found 17 articles might satisfy the inclusion criteria through full text reading, but one did not explicitly report the patients’ number using the fourth-generation ceramics [ 14 ], and one got conclusions from the same population [ 15 ], and one was a case report [ 5 ]. Finally, the remaining 14 articles were included for meta-analyses [ 16 29 ]. The flowchart of literature selection was shown in Additional file 1 : Figure S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we found 17 articles might satisfy the inclusion criteria through full text reading, but one did not explicitly report the patients’ number using the fourth-generation ceramics [ 14 ], and one got conclusions from the same population [ 15 ], and one was a case report [ 5 ]. Finally, the remaining 14 articles were included for meta-analyses [ 16 29 ]. The flowchart of literature selection was shown in Additional file 1 : Figure S1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implants with ceramic bearing surfaces are widely used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the preferred choice for younger and more active patients because they are: i) more resistant to wear, ii) have less periprosthetic osteolysis-caused loosening, and iii) improved implant survival rates 1 2 3) . Although ceramic liner and femoral head breakage was reported in the early years 4 5 6) , the risk of breakage has dramatically decreased with the distribution of the fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings, following the third-generation CoC bearings manufactured by hot isostatic pressing and laser marking 7 8) . However, squeaking sounds have been reported following THA performed using the fourth-generation ceramic bearings 9 10 11) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time THAs were performed during this investigation, MoM and CoC bearings were thought to have numerous potential advantages versus a traditional, MoP bearing [11,13,27,33]. However, published investigations began to report the phenomenon of noise associated with hard-on-hard bearings [1,2,8,14,24]. The cause of noise generation in hardon-hard bearings is an area of much debate, because some studies have pointed toward component design [30,31], others have reported decreased acetabular inclination and anteversion to be risk factors in CoC implants [24], whereas increased acetabular inclination has been noted as a risk factor in MoM implants [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, published reports began to note the phenomenon of noise associated with hard-on-hard bearings [1,2,8,14,24]. However, prior reports have been limited by the potential for observer bias, the variability in which noise generation was assessed, and a lack of correlation with patient-reported outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%