2014
DOI: 10.1115/1.4026942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Pressure and Steam Dilution on NOx and CO Emissions in a Premixed Natural Gas Flame

Abstract: C h ris tia n O liv e r P a s c h e r e it1In flu en ce of Pressure and S team D ilu tio n on NOx and CO Em issions in a P rem ixed N atu ral Gas F lam eIn the current study, the influence o f pressure and steam on the emission formation in a premixed natural gas flame is investigated at pressures between 1.5 bar and 9 bar. A pre mixed, swirl-stabilized combustor is developed that provides a stable flame up to very high steam contents. Combustion tests are conducted at different pressure levels fo r equivalenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned before [26], flame residence time t R has an important influence on NO formation. The flame residence time t R can be measured with a global flame residence time t g , which is defined as Equation (10). The t g has been used in some previous analyses for NO x formation [22,40,41], its definition is based on the consideration that the flame volume V f is proportional to L f 3 , as indicated by Equation 11:…”
Section: Global Flame Residence Timementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned before [26], flame residence time t R has an important influence on NO formation. The flame residence time t R can be measured with a global flame residence time t g , which is defined as Equation (10). The t g has been used in some previous analyses for NO x formation [22,40,41], its definition is based on the consideration that the flame volume V f is proportional to L f 3 , as indicated by Equation 11:…”
Section: Global Flame Residence Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results revealed that the NO x exponent n changed from −0.18 to 1.6 for the tangential nozzle and from −0.77 to 0.61 for the axial nozzle as the equivalence ratio varied from 0.43 to 0.65. Göke et al [10] studied NO x and CO emissions for a premixed natural gas flame within a pressure range of 1.5-9.0 bar by performing experiments and simulations. They found that NO x increased and CO decreased with increasing pressure, the exponent for NO x emissions increased with equivalence ratio from 0.1 to 0.65 while the exponent for CO emissions was about −0.4 at lower temperatures and −0.5 at higher temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the issue of environmentally friendly combustion of heavy hydrocarbons and substandard fuels for cheap energy production is relevant [1,2]. One of the promising approaches to reduce toxic products when burning liquid combustible waste is steam injection into the combustion zone as an effective way to suppress nitrogen oxides and soot formation [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the aerosol particles and cloud (fog) droplets can influence atmospheric visibility (Watson, 2002), and in the ambient atmosphere no cloud (fog) can be formed if no hygroscopic aerosols can be activated to cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) or ice nuclei (IN) (Twomey, 1977;Seinfeld and Pandis, 1997), high loadings of aerosols not only affect climate change (Forster et al, 2007;Boucher et al, 2013) but also adversely influence weather (Wang et al, 2010;Pérez et al, 2006) and contribute to the occurrence of haze and fog events, both of which can be considered as types of aerosol pollution in present-day China (Zhang et al, 2013). Since there have been individual reports of persistent haze-fog events in January 2013 in central-eastern China, the change in aerosol particles and their chemical components are attracting special attention in this rapid economic growth and high population density area (H. Wang et al, 2015;Huang et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2013;Guo et al, 2014;. However, questions were raised about what changes occurred to the major chemical components of aerosol in different haze areas in China during recent years, as well as why a big difference existed between 2013 and an adjacent year in the case of no significant changes in emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%