2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2019.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of prenatal environment and birth parameters on amblyopia, strabismus, and anisometropia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a cohort of young adult individuals from Australia, the prevalence of strabismus was 3.5%, and esotropia was found to be associated with lower gestational age (Lingham et al. 2020). At 10 years of age, the strongest risk factors for strabismus were anisometropia at 6 months of age, refractive errors at 2.5 years of age and various neurological conditions (Holmstrom et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a cohort of young adult individuals from Australia, the prevalence of strabismus was 3.5%, and esotropia was found to be associated with lower gestational age (Lingham et al. 2020). At 10 years of age, the strongest risk factors for strabismus were anisometropia at 6 months of age, refractive errors at 2.5 years of age and various neurological conditions (Holmstrom et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, strabismus was associated with gestational age, hyperopic refractive error, and astigmatism [10]. Esotropia, with lower gestational age and a heavier placenta; exotropia, with a maternal history of previously treated hypertension and maternal use of recreational drugs during early pregnancy [11]. (2) Early screening of children's vision and binocular visual function is associated with the incidence of exotropia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants with a history of any uveitis were also removed from the analysis given previous reports of decreased retinal thickness in autoimmune disease. 4,5 Amblyopic eyes, defined as per previous studies [26][27][28] (including in the Raine Study and the KYAMS cohorts), 29,30 were additionally excluded as thicker retinas have been reported in amblyopic eyes. 31,32 To avoid including participants with an unreported diagnosis of retinal or optic disc disease, eyes with BCVA <6/9 were further excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Study Samplementioning
confidence: 99%