2018
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ary140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of preexisting preference for color on sampling and tracking behavior in bumble bees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intraspecific variation of bumble bee foraging preferences has been demonstrated under laboratory conditions (Ings et al 2009, Maharaj et al 2019); our study reveals the in situ variation of preference for multiple bumble bee species through elevational and temporal gradients of floristic turnover. At least three mechanisms could underlie the variation of preferences we observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Intraspecific variation of bumble bee foraging preferences has been demonstrated under laboratory conditions (Ings et al 2009, Maharaj et al 2019); our study reveals the in situ variation of preference for multiple bumble bee species through elevational and temporal gradients of floristic turnover. At least three mechanisms could underlie the variation of preferences we observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Color preferences may impact learning, and the extent of this impact may depend on the type of learning as well as on the developmental and evolutionary history of the animals. Animals are often better able to perceive colors that contrast with their environments 13 , and such sensory abilities and consequent preferences depend on both evolutionary history 4 and individual experience 5 . The impact of color preferences on learning may also depend on the specific type of learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even invertebrates have already been successfully challenged with visual reversal tasks (e.g., Liedtke and Schneider 2014; Bublitz et al. 2017; Maharaj et al. 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%