2004
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.027912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Preanalytical Factors on the Immulite Intact Parathyroid Hormone Assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

3
6
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancies are not unique to reagent lot 121. We have seen similar differences with lots 114 and 115 (data not shown), as have others with lots 109 and 112 (12 ). In addition, the negative difference for SST serum compared with EDTA plasma was not a matrix effect attributable to the SST tube, as reported for other analytes on the Immulite 2000 (16 ).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The discrepancies are not unique to reagent lot 121. We have seen similar differences with lots 114 and 115 (data not shown), as have others with lots 109 and 112 (12 ). In addition, the negative difference for SST serum compared with EDTA plasma was not a matrix effect attributable to the SST tube, as reported for other analytes on the Immulite 2000 (16 ).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…The consistently higher baseline results in EDTA plasma over SST have been noted previously in more heterogeneous populations (6,12 ). Appropriately, DPC has issued EDTA-specific reference intervals (13 ).…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, two samples would be needed once again. Finally, excess EDTA in underfilled tubes can inhibit signal production in methods that use alkaline phosphatase [22]. In conclusion, excepted for the particular case of parathyroid surgery, we believe that serum should be preferred over EDTA for routine testing.…”
Section: Disadvantages Of Plasma Over Serummentioning
confidence: 93%