Influence of polyester spacer fabric, cotton, chloroprene rubber, and silicone on microclimatic and morphologic physiologic skin parameters in vivo

Abstract

Background Skin diseases can develop upon disadvantageous microclimate in relation to skin contact with textiles of supporting devices. Increased temperature, moisture, mechanical fracture, pressure, and inflammatory processes often occur mutually and enhance each other in their adverse effects. Therefore, the early prevention of skin irritations by improvement of microclimatic properties of skin in contact with supporting devices is important. Materials and Methods In this study, the microclimate under occlusion with polyester, cotton, chloroprene rubber, and silicone textiles, used for supporting devices, was analyzed by determining several characteristic physiologic skin parameters in vivo, including temperature, moisture, and transepidermal water loss (TEWL). This is achieved by comparing a miniaturized in vivo detection device with several established optical and sensory methods in vivo. Results A highly significant TEWL decrease was found after polyester, chloroprene rubber, and silicone application. The application of all materials showed highly significant decrease in skin surface temperature, with chloroprene rubber showing the lowest. Similarly, all materials showed highly significant increase in relative moisture, where the highest increase was found for chloroprene rubber and silicone and the lowest increase for cotton. The cutaneous carotenoid concentration of chloroprene rubber, silicone, and polyester decreased. A manipulation of the surface structure of the stratum corneum was recognized for all materials except for cotton by laser scanning microscopy. Conclusion The skin parameters temperature, relative moisture, antioxidant status, and TEWL can effectively characterize the microclimatic environment during occlusion with medical supporting materials. These parameters could potentially be used to develop standardized testing procedures for material evaluation.

Retaining Skin Barrier Function Properties of the Stratum Corneum with Components of the Natural Moisturizing Factor—A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind In Vivo Study

“…The epidermal renewal entails a loss of ≈1 corneocyte layer per day [50] out of the ≈10-15 layers of corneocytes, of which the SC consists [30]. A further, albeit unlikely explanation could be effects of washing and contact to clothes for longer time periods [51]. Figure 3 shows the NMF concentration profiles in the SC.…”

The plausible effects of wearing face masks on sports performance – A scoping review

“… •Sensory burden [64] . •Skin irritation due to fabric [65] . •Ocular irritation due to the exhaled air escaping through the top of the mask [66] •Individualization: proper fit, comfort, game/training demands.…”

P2/N95 respirators & surgical masks to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection: Effectiveness & adverse effects

“…However, mandating mask and respirator use might not lead to use, suggesting that barriers to use are important considerations when mandating specific PPE ( 16 ). During the pandemic, HCWs have needed to wear PPE for several hours and days in a row, rendering them susceptible to adverse events (AEs) associated with prolonged contact between mask material and the skin ( 17 , 18 , 19 ), such as injury and absenteeism ( 20 ), prompting measures to be taken to protect the skin of HCWs wearing PPE ( 21 ).…”