2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2015.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of pH and antibiotic solubility on the removal of ciprofloxacin from aqueous media using montmorillonite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
57
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
57
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, π-π EDA and hydrophobic interaction still worked 36 . Thus, the adsorption of CIP was continuous, even though these processes were slow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, π-π EDA and hydrophobic interaction still worked 36 . Thus, the adsorption of CIP was continuous, even though these processes were slow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The 1653 cm −1 vibration of pepsin was attributed to amine I 18 . The broad band at 1040 cm −1 was attributed to Si–O stretch of di and trioctahedral smectites 36 . Meanwhile, the band at 1709 cm −1 obviously disappeared for GO, rGO, and Mont and their mixtures loaded with CIP, indicating that COOH was involved in the interactions.
Figure 5FTIR spectra of GO, rGO and Mont under the varying interaction systems after adsorption at the range of 800 to1800 cm −1 at pH 2.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings reported on the best fit model for the adsorption process based on pseudo-second order kinetic model equation including adsorption of CIP onto montmorillonite, ordered mesoporous carbon (OMC) and bamboo-based carbon (BC), and enrofloxacin and ofloxacin onto bamboo biochar. 15,21,22…”
Section: Pseudo-second Order Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect of pH on CIP aqueous solubility calculated using the following equation: S = S 0 1 + 10 (pka 1 −pH) + 10 (pH−pka 2 ) , with pka 1 = 6.2, pka 2 = 8.6[20,75]. Individual values are from Yu et al[76] (empty triangles); McShane et al[20] (plain dot); Blokhina et al[77] (empty diamond; Roca Jalil et al[78] (square). Values were measured between 25 and 30 • C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%