1999
DOI: 10.1080/026567399285512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of patient models and numerical methods on predicted power deposition patterns

Abstract: The methods employing region-based geometry models such as the VSIE method and FDTD method in conjunction with a posteriori correction at tissue interfaces result in comparable E-field distributions for regional hyperthermia. Due to its shorter calculation time, the FDTD method is currently used in the clinic. Predictions derived from HU-based models without prior corrections of tissue specifications are not always supported by clinical experience.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wust et al showed that surface models, i.e. delineated tissue boundaries for each distinct organ or tissue region, each with assigned homogenous dielectric properties, match clinical results better than models that attempt to derive heterogeneous dielectric properties directly from CT data (14, 15). Similar results were obtained from attempts to use to MR-derived heterogeneous tissue models (16, 17).…”
Section: D Patient Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wust et al showed that surface models, i.e. delineated tissue boundaries for each distinct organ or tissue region, each with assigned homogenous dielectric properties, match clinical results better than models that attempt to derive heterogeneous dielectric properties directly from CT data (14, 15). Similar results were obtained from attempts to use to MR-derived heterogeneous tissue models (16, 17).…”
Section: D Patient Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wust et al have shown that absorbed power calculations based on manually delineated dielectric models yield a much better correlation with measurements during treatment than calculations using models created by Hounsfield Unit based automatic segmentation techniques [ 41 ]. Requirements to normal tissue delineation for HTP are higher than for radiotherapy treatment planning, because of the large variation in dielectric and thermal properties between different organs and tissue regions, and in particular the electromagnetic boundary conditions (4th Maxwell equation).…”
Section: Hyperthermia Treatment Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of HTP is also illustrated by the decision of the European Society on Hyperthermic Oncology (ESHO) to include HTP in their quality assurance guidelines for deep hyperthermia [15,[21][22][23]. HTP prediction accuracy is, however, strongly dependent on the patient model [24][25][26][27]. For head and neck hyperthermia, the study by Verhaart et al showed many tissues are required for an accurate and realistic representation [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%