1962
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of nerve‐ending activity and of drugs on the rate of paralysis of rat diaphragm preparation by Cl. botulinum type A toxin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of nerve stimulation markedly affects the rate of action of botulinum toxin (Hughes & Whaler, 1962) and taipoxin (Kamenskaya & Thesleff, 1974). The P-C complex showed no such dependency as increasing the rate of stimulation 40-fold from 0.05 Hz to 2 Hz had no significant effect on the rate of block produced by either 2.3 ,ug/ml or by 15 ,ug/ml P-C complex in 6 experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The frequency of nerve stimulation markedly affects the rate of action of botulinum toxin (Hughes & Whaler, 1962) and taipoxin (Kamenskaya & Thesleff, 1974). The P-C complex showed no such dependency as increasing the rate of stimulation 40-fold from 0.05 Hz to 2 Hz had no significant effect on the rate of block produced by either 2.3 ,ug/ml or by 15 ,ug/ml P-C complex in 6 experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…botulinum toxin in vitro; Burgen et al, 1949). However it is known that the presynaptic blocking effects of botulinum toxin and /3-bungarotoxin are partially dependent upon the frequency of nerve activity (Hughes & Whaler, 1962;Lee & Chang, 1966;Simpson, 1971), and this may be true for Tiger snake toxin. It is also of interest that 83-bungarotoxin, in contrast to Tiger snake toxin, first causes an increase in m.e.p.p.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the clostridial toxins botulinum neurotoxin A and tetanus neurotoxin both share sites of action with LEV, entering vesicles by binding to SV2 within the vesicle lumen (Dong et al 2006;Yeh et al 2010). Botulinum neurotoxin A seems to exhibit a latency before effect, which is shortened when neurotransmitter release is stimulated (Hughes and Whaler 1962). Similarly, staining for tetanus neurotoxin demonstrates that its activity-dependent entry into nerve terminals resembles LEV (Yeh et al 2010).…”
Section: Synaptic Activity Modulates the Efficacy Of Levmentioning
confidence: 99%