2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of misfit stresses on dislocation glide in single crystal superalloys: A three-dimensional discrete dislocation dynamics study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to the fitting process, some material constants, such as APB energy, drag coefficient and initial dislocation density, were adapted from the literature (Gao et al 2015). During the simulation, the resulting stress values were compared with the experimental data until a reasonable match was obtained.…”
Section: Parameter Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the fitting process, some material constants, such as APB energy, drag coefficient and initial dislocation density, were adapted from the literature (Gao et al 2015). During the simulation, the resulting stress values were compared with the experimental data until a reasonable match was obtained.…”
Section: Parameter Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prevent such issues, the initial lengths of all dislocation sources were set to be 0.0875 μm (>channel width of 0.0475 μm). The initial dislocation density of nickel-based superalloy adopted in previous 3D DDD simulations [7,8,25,26] ranged from 1.4 × 10 12 to 6.7 × 10 13 m −2…”
Section: Rve Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the fitting process, some fundamental material parameters such as Poisson's ratio and modulus were directly obtained from experimental measurements. Initial values of other dislocation-dynamics related parameters were estimated based on the literature [7,26]. Following each simulation, the stress-strain responses were obtained and compared with those measured experimentally to assess the difference.…”
Section: Rve Size and Model Parameter Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, all these simulations were still far away of providing parameter-free, quantitative estimations of precipitate-strengthening in metallic alloys because they did not considered very important factors such as the actual shape and crystallographic orientation of the precipitates and of the coherency or transformation stresses around the precipitates. More recent simulations [20,21,22] have demonstrated the large contribution of these factors to the CRSS but direct comparison with experimental data including all the relevant physical processes that determine the dislocation/precipitate interactions are not available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%