2008
DOI: 10.3103/s0147687408040078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of microwave radiation on soil bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results generally indicated that the total colony counts and viability ratios of the Bacteria and fungi strains for the EMR exposed samples decreased with increase in exposure periods from zero (0) to ninety (90) days compared to the EMR unexposed samples (Table 1 and Table 2). Though, bacterial species have been reported to differ in their susceptibility to EMR inactivation [22], the results however, were consistent with the findings of [23][24][25], that an increase in magnetic strength caused mortality in E. coli with the organism losing its ability to form colonies and consequently grew at a slower rate than the control. This observation have be attributed to non-thermal (athermal) effect, which has been suggested to have an important role in the suppression of microorganisms in suspension [26], though; the mechanism of action has not been fully reported.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The results generally indicated that the total colony counts and viability ratios of the Bacteria and fungi strains for the EMR exposed samples decreased with increase in exposure periods from zero (0) to ninety (90) days compared to the EMR unexposed samples (Table 1 and Table 2). Though, bacterial species have been reported to differ in their susceptibility to EMR inactivation [22], the results however, were consistent with the findings of [23][24][25], that an increase in magnetic strength caused mortality in E. coli with the organism losing its ability to form colonies and consequently grew at a slower rate than the control. This observation have be attributed to non-thermal (athermal) effect, which has been suggested to have an important role in the suppression of microorganisms in suspension [26], though; the mechanism of action has not been fully reported.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…At the end of each period, the samples were evaluate electrochemically. The SMB routine was make by Irradiation-Extraction (Islam and Weil, 1998;Komarova et al, 2008) and the determination of the present carbon in the extracts is according to Tedesco et al (1995).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…applying generates heat that can be conducted to insects, weeds, or fungi, for example, Fusarium Oxysporym and Sclerotium rolfsii (Abate, 2008;Brodie et al, 2015;Vitale et al, 2011Vitale et al, , 2013, leading to hyperthermic conditions and then to death of noxious species, ensuring an augmented crop yield (Komarova et al, 2008;Vela et al, 1976;Vela & Wu, 1979).…”
Section: Thermal Inactivation Of Soil Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil is a lossy dielectric, whose losses are strongly dependent on the water content and can therefore be increased after irrigation. The dissipation in MWs applying generates heat that can be conducted to insects, weeds, or fungi, for example, Fusarium Oxysporym and Sclerotium rolfsii (Abate, ; Brodie et al, ; Vitale et al, , ), leading to hyperthermic conditions and then to death of noxious species, ensuring an augmented crop yield (Komarova et al, ; Vela et al, ; Vela & Wu, ).…”
Section: Thermal Inactivation Of Soil Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%