2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of membrane, solute and solution properties on the retention of phenolic compounds in aqueous solution by nanofiltration membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
54
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results show an important diminution in membrane performance after long periods of membrane use, revealed through the important decrease of the permeability coefficients of water (about 34%) and NaCl (about 69%), probably due to the adsorption of 4NP and 4NA on the membrane, as it has been described by different authors for other organic compounds [41,42]. The membrane treatment with ultrasounds leads to an increase of permeability coefficients of water (about 10%) and NaCl (about 34%), compared with those before ultrasounds treatment, but also to an important decrease of all permeability coefficients, if compared with the initial conditions (diminutions of about 28% for water, 58% for NaCl and 46% for 4NP and 4NA).…”
Section: Effect Of Ultrasound Membrane Cleaning On Membrane Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Results show an important diminution in membrane performance after long periods of membrane use, revealed through the important decrease of the permeability coefficients of water (about 34%) and NaCl (about 69%), probably due to the adsorption of 4NP and 4NA on the membrane, as it has been described by different authors for other organic compounds [41,42]. The membrane treatment with ultrasounds leads to an increase of permeability coefficients of water (about 10%) and NaCl (about 34%), compared with those before ultrasounds treatment, but also to an important decrease of all permeability coefficients, if compared with the initial conditions (diminutions of about 28% for water, 58% for NaCl and 46% for 4NP and 4NA).…”
Section: Effect Of Ultrasound Membrane Cleaning On Membrane Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The average pore radius of virgin and chemically cleaned membrane was determined from the rejection data of the reference solutes and the pore transport model that incorporates hindered convection (size exclusion) and diffusion. This method has been widely used to determine the average pore size of nanofiltration membranes [30][31][32]. It is assumed in the pore transport model that the membrane pores are uniform and cylindrical and the solutes are spherical.…”
Section: Estimating the Average Membrane Pore Radiusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separation behaviours of some trace organic contaminants can be quite different from those of inorganic salts (Bellona and Drewes, 2005;Bellona et al, 2004;López-Muñoz et al, 2009;Nghiem et al, 2006;Nghiem et al, 2004;Van der Bruggen et al, 2006). By altering the membrane surface characteristics, membrane fouling can exert a considerable impact on the removal of trace organic contaminants by NF/RO membranes (Agenson and Urase, 2007;Nghiem and Coleman, 2008;Nghiem et al, 2008a;Nghiem et al, 2008b;Verliefde et al, 2009;Xu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%