Influence of membrane pore-size on the recovery of endogenous viruses from wastewater using an adsorption-extraction method

Ahmed, Warish; Smith, Wendy; Sirikanchana, Kwanrawee; Kitajima, Masaaki; Bivins, Aaron; Simpson, Steven

doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114732

Cited by 9 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Earlier than the development of WBE for the COVID-19 pandemic, previous studies showed that the detection of viral pathogens in sewage depended on the concentration and extraction methods used [21][22][23]. With the rise of the COVID-19 pandemic, the absence of guidelines for SARS-CoV-2 recovery from WW induced several groups to test different procedures of sampling, samples storage, concentration, extraction and viral detection, most of them focused on recovering the highest quantity of virus for RT-qPCR analysis [24][25][26]. Only recently some works [23,[27][28][29][30][31][32] have shifted this focus to improve genomic coverage for a good sequencing outcome.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficient wastewater sample filtration improves the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants: An extensive analysis based on sequencing parameters

Robotto,

Olivero,

Pozzi

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, many countries established wastewater (WW) surveillance to objectively monitor the level of infection within the population. As new variants continue to emerge, it has become clear that WW surveillance is an essential tool for the early detection of variants. The EU Commission published a recommendation suggesting an approach to establish surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and its variants in WW, besides specifying the methodology for WW concentration and RNA extraction. Therefore, different groups have approached the issue with different strategies, mainly focusing on WW concentration methods, but only a few groups highlighted the importance of prefiltering WW samples and/or purification of RNA samples. Aiming to obtain high-quality sequencing data allowing variants detection, we compared four experimental conditions generated from the treatment of: i) WW samples by WW filtration and ii) the extracted RNA by DNase treatment, purification and concentration of the extracted RNA. To evaluate the best condition, the results were assessed by focusing on several sequencing parameters, as the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 sequencing from WW is crucial for variant detection. Overall, the best sequencing result was obtained by filtering the WW sample. Moreover, the present study provides an overview of some sequencing parameters to consider when optimizing a method for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 variants from WW samples, which can also be applied to any sample preparation methodology.

show abstract