2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.166257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of mechanical and water-jet cutting on the dynamic magnetic properties of NO Fe-Si steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If we consider the M400-65A electrical steel, at peak magnetic polarization of 1 T and measuring frequency of 50 Hz, the total energy loss in the case of the water-jet cut sample is 32.88 mJ/kg and for the laser cut strips it increases to 41.79 mJ/kg. The chemical composition of the alloy is a key element, because by slightly modifying its constituents, the total energy loss could be reduced, and the magnetic permeability The width of the damaged zone was estimated to be between (3.5 ÷ 4.2) mm in the case of punching and (3 ÷ 3.4) mm for water-jet cut method [45][46][47], with higher values in the case of M400 steels, fact which determines a decrease of the relative magnetic permeability modulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we consider the M400-65A electrical steel, at peak magnetic polarization of 1 T and measuring frequency of 50 Hz, the total energy loss in the case of the water-jet cut sample is 32.88 mJ/kg and for the laser cut strips it increases to 41.79 mJ/kg. The chemical composition of the alloy is a key element, because by slightly modifying its constituents, the total energy loss could be reduced, and the magnetic permeability The width of the damaged zone was estimated to be between (3.5 ÷ 4.2) mm in the case of punching and (3 ÷ 3.4) mm for water-jet cut method [45][46][47], with higher values in the case of M400 steels, fact which determines a decrease of the relative magnetic permeability modulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact can be correlated with the increased strain hardening phenomena that appears during mechanical cutting for increased sample thickness. The width of the damaged zone was estimated to be between (3.5 ÷ 4.2) mm in the case of punching and (3 ÷ 3.4) mm for water-jet cut method [45][46][47], with higher values in the case of M400 steels, fact which determines a decrease of the relative magnetic permeability modulus.…”
Section: Sample Grade [µM]mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The papers [70,71] examined non-oriented sheets with a width of 0.2 and 0.35 mm and a width of 5 to 60 mm in a wide frequency range. Based on experimental tests, the width of the degraded zone was determined to equal: for a sheet of 0.2 mm thickness, 1.739 mm and a sheet of 0.35 mm thickness, 2.044 mm.…”
Section: Simulation Models Of Changes In Electromagnetic Properties C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on experimental tests, the width of the degraded zone was determined to equal: for a sheet of 0.2 mm thickness, 1.739 mm and a sheet of 0.35 mm thickness, 2.044 mm. In paper [71], tests were also carried out for sheets cut using a water jet, and although this method of cutting is considered the least invasive, the width of such a zone was determined to be 1.5 mm. However, it should be noted that such a significant width of the damaged zone is not confirmed in other works.…”
Section: Simulation Models Of Changes In Electromagnetic Properties C...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conducted research mainly concerns the impact of mechanical cutting, while there are relatively few deepened studies on the effect of laser cutting [12][13][14][15]. In addition, a small group of research on the estimation of local material properties can be identified, based on the results of macroscopic examinations [12,[16][17][18]. In turn, other researchers deal with the observations at the level of the internal structure of the material, showing its changes resulting from the cutting technology used [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%