2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00542-008-0636-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of material stiffness and geometrical variations on the electro-thermally driven microactuator performance

Abstract: In order to make robust design of microdevices, it is important to implement a model considering uncertainty analysis. The high cost of experimentation and product development has led to an emphasis on simulated based design to achieve the success in the first-pass design and reliability. In this paper, finite element model is developed to investigate the effects of geometrical and material stiffness variations on an electro-thermally driven microactuator performance as an example. These microactuators are gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In microfabrication process, as a consequence of photolithography exposure, etch undercut, both widths and the lengths of parts can be p offset = 0.1 ± 0.08 lm (Fig. 2) less than specified value with standard deviation of 0.04 lm for 95% confidence (Shamshirsaz et al 2009;Tanner et al 2003;Gupta 2000). In this paper, the variation in beam widths and lengths of microactuator and gap between hot and cold arms are assumed similar to data reported by Wittwer (Wittwer 2005):…”
Section: Dimensional and Materials Property Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In microfabrication process, as a consequence of photolithography exposure, etch undercut, both widths and the lengths of parts can be p offset = 0.1 ± 0.08 lm (Fig. 2) less than specified value with standard deviation of 0.04 lm for 95% confidence (Shamshirsaz et al 2009;Tanner et al 2003;Gupta 2000). In this paper, the variation in beam widths and lengths of microactuator and gap between hot and cold arms are assumed similar to data reported by Wittwer (Wittwer 2005):…”
Section: Dimensional and Materials Property Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This device generates deflection through asymmetric heating of the hot and cold polysilicon arms with variable length or cross-section. However, many efforts have been carried out to explore the characterization and behavior of electro-thermally driven microactuators (Shamshirsaz et al 2009;Huang and Lee 1999a, b;Atre 2006;Pan and Hsu 1997), but few works have been carried out to consider the influence of material and geometrical uncertainties on electrothermal microactuator performance. Simulation-based design under uncertainty for compliant microelectromechanical systems has been studied by Wittwer using response surface metamodeling (RSM) (Wittwer 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…FEM analysis is principally used to demonstrate the feasibility of the design and to simulate the behaviour; for example, the relationship between the applied voltage and the displacement [1,37,43,44], or the effects of geometrical and material stiffness variations on the performance [45].…”
Section: Finite Element Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%