1991
DOI: 10.1128/iai.59.10.3667-3672.1991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of major histocompatibility complex haplotype on the mitogenic response of T cells to staphylococcal enterotoxin B

Abstract: The abilities of antigen-presenting cells (APC) from nine independent major histocompatibility complex haplotypes and a number of intra-H-2 recombinant congenic strains of mice to present staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) and induce proliferation in murine T-cell receptor Vi8' T-cell clones were compared. SEB presented by APC of all haplotypes tested induced significant responses in each of the T-cell clones. The magnitude of response was similar for most haplotypes, but there were limited quantitative differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C57Bl/6 mice lack a functional MHC class II I-E (Jones et al, 1981;Mathis et al, 1983) which has been previously correlated with reduced immune responsiveness to certain proteins such as pigeon cytochrome c (PCC) (Schwartz et al, 1976;Solinger et al, 1979), Hen Egg Lysozyme (HEL) (Hill and Sercarz, 1975) and Hepatitis B antigen (HBsAg) (Neurath et al, 1983). Further, C57Bl/6 antigen presenting cells (APCs) were shown to be poor in inducing anti-staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) responses from SEB-specific T cell clones (Robinson et al, 1991) suggesting that it is possible that fewer peptides from OVA and hALAC are presented in C57Bl/ 6 than in other strains thereby generating a lower magnitude of response. One reason for the recent increase in popularity of C57Bl/6 mice in immunological models in spite of its relatively poor CD4 response is the explosion in gene targeting studies employing the "knock out" technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C57Bl/6 mice lack a functional MHC class II I-E (Jones et al, 1981;Mathis et al, 1983) which has been previously correlated with reduced immune responsiveness to certain proteins such as pigeon cytochrome c (PCC) (Schwartz et al, 1976;Solinger et al, 1979), Hen Egg Lysozyme (HEL) (Hill and Sercarz, 1975) and Hepatitis B antigen (HBsAg) (Neurath et al, 1983). Further, C57Bl/6 antigen presenting cells (APCs) were shown to be poor in inducing anti-staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) responses from SEB-specific T cell clones (Robinson et al, 1991) suggesting that it is possible that fewer peptides from OVA and hALAC are presented in C57Bl/ 6 than in other strains thereby generating a lower magnitude of response. One reason for the recent increase in popularity of C57Bl/6 mice in immunological models in spite of its relatively poor CD4 response is the explosion in gene targeting studies employing the "knock out" technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on July 31, 2020 by guest http://iai.asm.org/ Downloaded from T-cell clone is dominated by I-E (26). However, in the absence of I-E, some antigen-presenting cells bearing I-A alleles can present SEB as effectively as those expressing both I-A and I-E.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study of the presentation of rSEB by mouse APC suggested that alleles of MHC class II molecules differ in their ability to present SEB to mouse T-cell clones (Robinson et al, 1991) and that rSEB is presented predominantly by E molecules, although A molecules are able to present in the absence of E. The results obtained with SPEA show significant differences when compared to those obtained with SEB, suggesting that the differences in sequence at the putative MHC binding site cause different binding affinities for MHC class II. The presentation of SEB by E molecules, overall, was relatively uniform, while SPEA binding was more variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The points on each line correspond to rSPEA concentrations 1 × 10 -7 , 5 × 10 -8 , 1 × 10 -8 , 5 × 10 -9 , 1 × 10 -9 and 0 M from left to right. MHC class II molecules in normal mice (Sant & Germain, 1989) and T-cell responses have been reported which are restricted by Aα d Eβ d molecules (Ruberti et al, 1992). Thus, it is possible that SPEA is presented by Aα s Eβ s but not by Aα b Eβ b dimers.…”
Section: Proliferation Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%