2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of leaf surface wettability on the drop splash phenomenon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the rigidity of the leaf as well as macrotopographic features such as vascular bundles or trichomes, Fig. 3C), and can differ drastically from the theoretical predictions (Papierowska et al, 2019). Note that all of the above studies classify leaves by wettability (i.e.…”
Section: Wetting Versus Water Sheddingmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…the rigidity of the leaf as well as macrotopographic features such as vascular bundles or trichomes, Fig. 3C), and can differ drastically from the theoretical predictions (Papierowska et al, 2019). Note that all of the above studies classify leaves by wettability (i.e.…”
Section: Wetting Versus Water Sheddingmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although the hydrodynamics have been extremely well elucidated, experimentally, numerically and theoretically (Yarin 2006;Josserand and Thoroddsen 2016;Yarin et al 2017), one quantity remains extremely elusive for the case of a drop impact exceeding the splash threshold, namely the amount of residual liquid remaining on the surface, or alternatively, the amount of liquid splashed and re-emitted during the impact. In all cases, the residual mass on the surface is a quantity of great interest since it directly influences subsequent processes such as heat transfer (spray cooling (Breitenbach et al 2018)), wetted area (spray coating (Andrade et al 2013), encapsulation, leaf coverage (Papierowska et al 2019)) and ice accretion (Szilder et al 2002). Some work regarding the residual mass of a drop detaching from a fibre is available (Aziz et al 2018;Jamali et al 2021;Holweger et al 2021); however, the involved physics likely differ significantly from the mass loss from drop splashing on plane substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, variable-size atomized water-droplets spread downstream and converge on a solid surface. That is, the stochastic splash is of macroscopic splash characteristics with an enormous number of water-droplets, which is different from applications in other fields, e.g., forest fire fighting (liquid droplets impinging on a solid surface) [21], pesticide spraying (liquid droplets impinging on leaf surface) [22], diving (a solid falling into a liquid surface) [23], wind-driven rain erosion (rain droplets driven by high-speed wind impinging on building facades) [24], rain-wind-induced vibrations (rain droplets driven by high-speed wind impinging on beam or rope structures) [25], vehicle soiling and aircraft icing problems (droplets impinging on a high-speed moving boundary) [26], etc. Currently, all random splash models are conducted under atmospheric pressure with particular emphasis on various hydraulic conditions of inflow waterjets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%