2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10841-017-9964-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of land use on the taxonomic and functional diversity of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in the southern Atlantic forest of Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
5
25

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
42
5
25
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar pattern was also found by Gómez‐Cifuentes et al . (), who evaluated four types of land uses in relation to dung beetle functional richness and diversity in a northern Argentinean Atlantic Forest. However, this pattern was maintained only for night assemblages when using Rao functional divergence index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar pattern was also found by Gómez‐Cifuentes et al . (), who evaluated four types of land uses in relation to dung beetle functional richness and diversity in a northern Argentinean Atlantic Forest. However, this pattern was maintained only for night assemblages when using Rao functional divergence index.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effects have been observed across numerous taxa with diverse ecologies and spanning multiple trophic levels such as bees, beetles, butterflies, hemipterans, orthopterans, spiders (Börschig et al ., ; Rader et al ., ; Forrest et al ., ; Gámez‐Virués et al ., ; Mazzia et al ., ; Simons, Weisser & Gossner, ; De Palma et al ., ; Hanson et al ., ; but see Perović et al ., ; Le Provost et al ., ; Ng et al ., ), and soil‐dwelling arthropods in dozens of orders (Birkhofer et al ., ; Rigal et al ., ). By contrast, the effects of high‐intensity land use on the functional structures of arthropod communities may be buffered by landscape heterogeneity in relatively complex habitats such as forests (Edwards et al ., ; Gossner et al ., ; Gámez‐Virués et al ., ; Perović et al ., ; Birkhofer et al ., ; Gómez‐Cifuentes et al ., ; Murray et al ., ; Salas‐Lopez et al ., ; but see Martello et al ., ). It is important to note that most studies were conducted in temperate regions; additional studies incorporating varying landscapes and land‐use practices (grazing, logging etc.)…”
Section: Current Trait‐based Studies On Terrestrial Arthropodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the two wet regions with a low-intermediate precipitation seasonality (the humid Chaco and the Atlantic forest), dung beetle diversity in open livestock areas strongly differed from the native forest and the silvopastoral system; in contrast, in the region showing the strongest seasonality of precipitation (dry Chaco) differences on dung beetle diversity between livestock systems and native forests were not evident. Most previous studies have focused on the local consequences of cattle grazing [31][32][33]35,41,70,71 or on the importance of regional and local factors determining patterns of dung beetle diversity 30,[72][73][74] . However, this is one of the first field studies that explicitly considers the interaction of both scales through the comparison of the response of dung beetles to cattle raising among different regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scarabaeinae dung beetles are widely used as focal taxa in ecological studies because of their high diversity, wide distributional ranges, ecological role and sensitivity to human disturbances 28,29 . Previous studies have shown a reduction in both the taxonomic and functional diversity of dung beetles associated to the replacement of native forests by open pastures for cattle grazing [30][31][32] . In contrast, a series of recent studies showed that cattle areas preserving the forest canopy (particularly of native trees) totally or partially preserve the native diversity of dung beetles in forest ecosystems [33][34][35][36][37] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%