2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00260-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of lakeshore development on breeding bird communities in a mixed northern forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decade, many studies have focused on the abundance and distribution of wildlife, particularly avifauna, in urban habitats (Blair 1996;Clergeau et al 1998;Sauvajot et al 1998;Rottenborn 1999;Jokimäki and Huhta 2000;Nelson and Nelson 2001;Lindsay et al 2002;Melles et al 2003;Crooks et al 2004;Traut and Hostetler 2004;Donnelly and Marzluff 2006;Forrest and St. Clair 2006;reviewed in Chace and Walsh 2006). In contrast, comparatively few studies have examined behavioural associations with developed habitat (Gill et al 1996;Blumstein et al 2003;Beale and Monaghan 2004;reviewed in Frid and Dill 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, many studies have focused on the abundance and distribution of wildlife, particularly avifauna, in urban habitats (Blair 1996;Clergeau et al 1998;Sauvajot et al 1998;Rottenborn 1999;Jokimäki and Huhta 2000;Nelson and Nelson 2001;Lindsay et al 2002;Melles et al 2003;Crooks et al 2004;Traut and Hostetler 2004;Donnelly and Marzluff 2006;Forrest and St. Clair 2006;reviewed in Chace and Walsh 2006). In contrast, comparatively few studies have examined behavioural associations with developed habitat (Gill et al 1996;Blumstein et al 2003;Beale and Monaghan 2004;reviewed in Frid and Dill 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately a variety of actions are available to property owners to mitigate the impact of development, such as selectively planting native vegetation or allowing remnant natural vegetation to grow in the near-shore zone * Corresponding author: amato@wisc.edu of their property and the littoral zone along it. The benefits of more natural shorelines may include increased plant diversity (Elias and Meyer 2003), reduced algae (Rosenberger et al 2008), higher numbers of animals such as frogs and native birds (Lindsay et al 2002, Woodford and Meyer 2003, Henning and Remsburg 2009, as well as larger and more abundant fish populations (Radomski andGoeman 2001, Helmus andSass 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human land-use within the lake riparian zone has been linked with direct riparian, shoreline and littoral habitat modification (Jennings et al, 2003;Marburg et al, 2006) as well as impacts on various species groups from amphibians to birds to fish (Lindsay et al, 2002;Woodford & Meyer, 2003;Sass et al, 2006). The link between riparian actions and species that utilize this terrestrial-aquatic interface is clear and lake managers have taken notice by beginning to survey habitat and restore shorelines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%