2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Interface on epoxy/clay Nanocomposites: 2. Mechanical and Thermal Dynamic Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar increases in the Tg were observed for the nanocomposites produced with an epoxy and different types of modified graphene. However, it is important to note that graphene fillers possessed a similar tendency to increase the glass transition temperature in the case of the materials [38,39].…”
Section: Thermal Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar increases in the Tg were observed for the nanocomposites produced with an epoxy and different types of modified graphene. However, it is important to note that graphene fillers possessed a similar tendency to increase the glass transition temperature in the case of the materials [38,39].…”
Section: Thermal Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ribeiro et al [38] studied the glass transition improvement in grapheneepoxy composites. Multi-nanostructured (clay and graphene platelets) reinforced epoxy nanocomposites have been also studied by Zaman et al [39]. Mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites containing GO and liquid crystalline epoxy have also been studied [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of nanoparticles such as graphene, graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes, and nanosilica could improve toughness and mechanical properties, thermal stability, and anticorrosion properties of ER . Carolan et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3c shows the resistance curve (Rcurve) of E-GS-IV nanocomposite,f rom which the fracture toughness (K JC )i sc alculated to be about 2.9 MPa m 1/2 .T his fracture toughness is about 4.2 times higher than that of pure epoxy,a nd the calculated energy reaches up to about 3551.0 Jm À2 ,w hich is about 17.5 times higher than that of pure epoxy.T he fracture morphology of pure epoxy shows as mooth surface that cannot resist crack propagation, thus yielding ab rittle fracture ( Supporting Information, Figure S4a). Ther atios of K IC (nanocomposites) to K IC (epoxy) range from 1.0 to 2.5 due to the poor dispersion and homogeneous structure of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced with nanofillers,such as functionalized GO, [10] modified graphene, [11] carbon nanofibers (CNFs), [12] carbon nanotubes (CNTs), [13] and clay [14] (the corresponding abbreviations of the specific nanofillers are listed in the Supporting Information, Table S1). Thef ractography of the inverse artificial nacres shows layered structures with different thicknesses of epoxy layers.T he thinner the epoxy layers are,the longer the crack propagation path is,which alleviates high local stresses,d issipates more energy,a nd confers excellent fracture toughness to the inverse artificial nacres (Supporting Information, Figure S4c-f).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%