2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.10.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of hydrophobic and hydrophilic spacer-containing enzyme conjugates on functional parameters of steroid immunoassay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The insertion of hydrophilic spacers in OP-Pep2-HRP conjugate enhanced the sensitivity significantly. The finding was also supported by study carried out by Nara 19 , et al in which insertion of hydrophilic spacer resulted in the enhancement of sensitivity and specificity of assay. Possibly the use of a hydrophilic spacer helped in projecting the hapten in the aqueous phase, leading to enhanced antibody binding signal and improved sensitivity of the assay.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The insertion of hydrophilic spacers in OP-Pep2-HRP conjugate enhanced the sensitivity significantly. The finding was also supported by study carried out by Nara 19 , et al in which insertion of hydrophilic spacer resulted in the enhancement of sensitivity and specificity of assay. Possibly the use of a hydrophilic spacer helped in projecting the hapten in the aqueous phase, leading to enhanced antibody binding signal and improved sensitivity of the assay.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The Effect of ELISA format and spacer of enzyme conjugate both were found to play an important role in order to improve the sensitivity of immunoassay [19][20] . There are two kinds of assay formats, with either immobilised antigen or antibody.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the sensitivity and ED 50 of the assay depend partly on the nature of the steroid and spacer arm link to carrier protein and the enzyme. [35] CONCLUSION From the present study, we conclude that the physicochemical nature of the bridge and steroid is determinant in defining the assay parameters. Urea being a 3 atom homo-bifunctional non-aliphatic molecule, cheaply available, and hydrophobic in nature, could be tried for other steroids= hapten assays, and its role as a spacer needs to be studied more deeply at the structural level.…”
Section: Downloaded By [Anadolu University] At 06:35 26 December 2014mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This differential behavior of different linkers toward the sensitivity and ED 50 of assays might be due to the difference in the magnitude of overall forces of attraction between the antibody and the enzyme conjugates. [35] The incorporation of spacer arms might have resulted in minimization of the conventional bridge recognition effects, decrease in the influence of local environment, and overcoming steric constraints between the two high molecular weight proteins, i.e., antibody and label. [15][16][17] The specificities of the antibodies obtained depend partly on the nature of the steroid link to the protein carrier, in particular the position on the steroid nucleus at which the linker is attached, since this determines the orientation of the steroid in the antibody combining site.…”
Section: Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Weemen and Schuurs [41] observed that hapten and bridge heterology have a lesser effect on sensitivity compared with site-heterologous systems. In later studies, it has been reported that both bridge and hapten heterology improved sensitivity of EIAs for cortisol, [23,35,44] testosterone, [17,45] progesterone, [22,24,46] and DHEA. [34] In these heterologous assays, an EIA becomes specific and sensitive due to the use of structurally different hapten derivatives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%