2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2013.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of hill slope on biological pools of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in acidic alfisols of citrus orchard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This greatly alters the spatial variability of soil nutrients from the field level to the national scale and changes the relationships between soil nutrients (Jia et al 2011;Liu et al 2013;Roger et al 2014;Shuklaa et al 2016). Thus, considerable effort has been expended to assess the spatial variability of soil nutrients and the affecting factors in different areas in recent years (Wang et al 2009;Wanshnong et al 2013;Elbasiouny et al 2014;Roger et al 2014;Li et al 2016a). Due to the complexity of terrestrial ecosystems, the spatial variability of soil nutrients varies in different regions (Yang et al 2007;Wanshnong et al 2013;Roger et al 2014;Xin et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This greatly alters the spatial variability of soil nutrients from the field level to the national scale and changes the relationships between soil nutrients (Jia et al 2011;Liu et al 2013;Roger et al 2014;Shuklaa et al 2016). Thus, considerable effort has been expended to assess the spatial variability of soil nutrients and the affecting factors in different areas in recent years (Wang et al 2009;Wanshnong et al 2013;Elbasiouny et al 2014;Roger et al 2014;Li et al 2016a). Due to the complexity of terrestrial ecosystems, the spatial variability of soil nutrients varies in different regions (Yang et al 2007;Wanshnong et al 2013;Roger et al 2014;Xin et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, considerable effort has been expended to assess the spatial variability of soil nutrients and the affecting factors in different areas in recent years (Wang et al 2009;Wanshnong et al 2013;Elbasiouny et al 2014;Roger et al 2014;Li et al 2016a). Due to the complexity of terrestrial ecosystems, the spatial variability of soil nutrients varies in different regions (Yang et al 2007;Wanshnong et al 2013;Roger et al 2014;Xin et al 2016). These variations are caused by many environmental factors including climate, parent material, topography, soil type and human activity (Walter et al 2003;Wang et al 2009;Yang et al 2013;Basso et al 2016;Li et al 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have shown that the spatial distribution of soil nutrients are influenced by elevation, slope, and landscape positions, by soil use and management (Wang et al, 2009; Zhang et al, 2011), and by variations in microtopography such as surface roughness and tortuosity (Moser et al, 2009). Even under a uniform management, hill slope position determined the spatial–temporal variations in soil C, N, and P distribution in a citrus orchard (Wanshnong et al, 2013). Different geospatial techniques are used to quantify the spatial relationship between soils and the terrain attributes, and digital soil mapping (DSM) (McBratney et al, 2003)—a novel approach in soil mapping—describes such tools and techniques in soil mapping and in environmental applications (Boettinger et al, 2010; Lagacherie et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major role of topography is how it controls the (re)distribution of runoff and energy across landscapes and therefore could explain the spatial variability of soil P content and P index value across a farm (Adhikari et al, 2018;I. D. Moore et al, 1993;Wanshnong et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2014). The spatial relationship between terrain attributes and soil P measurements can be quantified, and a continuous P map can be generated using digital soil mapping (DSM) techniques (McBratney et al, 2003).…”
Section: Core Ideasmentioning
confidence: 99%