2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of heat treatment on the microstructure and performance of high-velocity oxy-fuel sprayed WC–12Co coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the coatings, the wear rate increased from 3.58 × 10 −5 mm 3 •N −1 •m −1 at RT to 9.79 × 10 −5 mm 3 •N −1 •m −1 at 500 • C. Similarly for the die steels, the wear rate firstly increased from 9.76 × 10 −5 mm 3 •N −1 •m −1 at RT to 14.39 × 10 −5 mm 3 •N −1 •m −1 at 200 • C, then climbed sharply to 150.4 × 10 −5 mm 3 •N −1 •m −1 at 500 • C. These changes were mainly related to the content and distribution of oxides, as can be seen in detail in undermentioned worn surfaces analysis, as well as to the change of structures and mechanical properties [41]. The second reason for these changes may be that the hardness of the coating increased when test temperature increased from RT to 500 • C, whereas the fracture toughness showed the reverse tendency, resulting in the lowest wear resistance at 500 • C. This is similar to phenomenon reported by Wang et al [42]. The third reason is the change in contact geometry, which resulted in a low friction coefficient.…”
Section: Friction and Wear Propertiessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For the coatings, the wear rate increased from 3.58 × 10 −5 mm 3 •N −1 •m −1 at RT to 9.79 × 10 −5 mm 3 •N −1 •m −1 at 500 • C. Similarly for the die steels, the wear rate firstly increased from 9.76 × 10 −5 mm 3 •N −1 •m −1 at RT to 14.39 × 10 −5 mm 3 •N −1 •m −1 at 200 • C, then climbed sharply to 150.4 × 10 −5 mm 3 •N −1 •m −1 at 500 • C. These changes were mainly related to the content and distribution of oxides, as can be seen in detail in undermentioned worn surfaces analysis, as well as to the change of structures and mechanical properties [41]. The second reason for these changes may be that the hardness of the coating increased when test temperature increased from RT to 500 • C, whereas the fracture toughness showed the reverse tendency, resulting in the lowest wear resistance at 500 • C. This is similar to phenomenon reported by Wang et al [42]. The third reason is the change in contact geometry, which resulted in a low friction coefficient.…”
Section: Friction and Wear Propertiessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For the cold-sprayed WC-(nanoWC-Co), the further increase in toughness during heat treatment contributes to a higher wear resistance, although the hardness tends to decrease a little. However, for HVOF-sprayed coatings, the heat treatment decreases the toughness and thereby leads to a lower wear resistance, which is consistent with literature [62].…”
Section: Strengthening Mechanism Of Wear Performancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…13a and c that both as-sprayed and annealed HVOF microWC-12Co coatings present a micro-cutting weight loss mechanism. Due to the decomposition of WC particles and appearance of phase during the annealing treatment of HVOF-sprayed microWC-Co coating, the annealing treatment leads to a decrease of wear performance [57,58]. From this point of view, the cutting weight loss of WC-(nanoWCCo) coatings would lower than microWC-Co coating owing to a higher hardness.…”
Section: Strengthening Mechanism Of Wear Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mateen et al [4] suggested that the near-nanostructured WC-Co coating had a greater plasticity within the coating and, in contrast, the microstructured coating suffered from significant brittle fracture. In general, the failure of WC-Co coatings is always related with the following mechanisms: (i) delamination of coating, (ii) micro-cutting, (iii) fracture of carbides, cracks generated at the binder phase and disruption of the carbide-binder interfaces, (iv) extrusion of the binder phase and removal by plastic deformation and fatigue, and (v) undermining of the particles and subsequent particle pull-out [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%