Abstract:The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical effects of graft stiffness and progression of marginal bone loss (MBL) in the bone surrounding an implant placed in a maxillary grafted sinus based on the finite element method. The simulating model of graft stiffness as well as depth of MBL was varied to simulate nine different clinical scenarios. The results showed that the high-level strain distributions in peri-implant tissue increased with the increase in MBL depth when the stiffness of the gr… Show more
“…In the present study, the marginal bone level decreased significantly in the BCP group after 3 years and the significant decrease sustained after 5 years of loading in contrast to the DBB group where there was no significant marginal bone decrease. It has been suggested, based on the finite element method, that load distribution and marginal bone loss around dental implants placed in augmented sinuses may be associated with the characteristics of the grafting materials . Furthermore, a stiffer graft may result in stress reduction in the residual bone .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested, based on the finite element method, that load distribution and marginal bone loss around dental implants placed in augmented sinuses may be associated with the characteristics of the grafting materials. 56 Furthermore, a stiffer graft may result in stress reduction in the residual bone. 57 Bone formation seems to take place mainly between the BCP particles rather than on the particle surfaces in the early healing phase 15,58,59 resulting in a lower bone to particle contact compared with DBB.…”
In this limited RCT study, the choice of biomaterial used for sinus floor augmentation did not seem to have any impact on survival rates and marginal bone level of the placed implants after 5 years of functional loading and GHR was minimal.
“…In the present study, the marginal bone level decreased significantly in the BCP group after 3 years and the significant decrease sustained after 5 years of loading in contrast to the DBB group where there was no significant marginal bone decrease. It has been suggested, based on the finite element method, that load distribution and marginal bone loss around dental implants placed in augmented sinuses may be associated with the characteristics of the grafting materials . Furthermore, a stiffer graft may result in stress reduction in the residual bone .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested, based on the finite element method, that load distribution and marginal bone loss around dental implants placed in augmented sinuses may be associated with the characteristics of the grafting materials. 56 Furthermore, a stiffer graft may result in stress reduction in the residual bone. 57 Bone formation seems to take place mainly between the BCP particles rather than on the particle surfaces in the early healing phase 15,58,59 resulting in a lower bone to particle contact compared with DBB.…”
In this limited RCT study, the choice of biomaterial used for sinus floor augmentation did not seem to have any impact on survival rates and marginal bone level of the placed implants after 5 years of functional loading and GHR was minimal.
“…In WS, a greater area is grafted and subjected to a greater and a longer graft resorption and replacement with new bone than in NS. This particular "active" bone substratum in conjunction with the peculiarity of each patient may lead to a different distribution of loading forces at the crestal level, which may produce a different MBL around the implant neck (Inglam et al 2010). Nevertheless, further investigation will be necessary to recognize the exact process involving the MBL around implants placed in an augmented sinus and maxillary sinus size.…”
This study is the first quantitative and statistically significant confirmation that crestal technique with residual ridge height <5 mm is more appropriate and predictable, in terms of intra-sinus bone coverage, in narrow than in WS.
“…While the osseous support of implants in pristine maxillae is exclusively native bone, peri‐implant tissues may also contain remnant graft particles after maxillary sinus floor elevation. Finite element analyses have suggested that the load distribution and MBL around implants placed in grafted sinus cavities may be strongly conditioned by the characteristics of the grafting material . Thus, it was observed that when the grafted volume was less stiff than the native bone, functional loading increased the concomitant stress at crestal bone level, which is typically associated with MBL .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element analyses have suggested that the load distribution and MBL around implants placed in grafted sinus cavities may be strongly conditioned by the characteristics of the grafting material. [31][32][33] Thus, it was observed that when the grafted volume was less stiff than the native bone, functional loading increased the concomitant stress at crestal bone level, 33 which is typically associated with MBL. 34 With regard to the biomaterial composite used in the present study, anorganic bovine bone material behaves in a similar way to autologous chin bone particles in augmented sinus areas except for a much slower resorption rate in comparison with autogenous grafts.…”
Resorption of grafts that combine autogenous cortical bone with anorganic bovine bone is dependent on the anatomic features of the sinus and is not affected by the time elapsed after the first 6 months. The MBL in implants placed in these grafted areas is time dependent and mainly related to potentially modifiable clinical decisions and patient habits.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.