2006
DOI: 10.1556/crc.34.2006.2-3.258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of gluten proteins on technological properties of Croatian wheat cultivars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the mean values of the technological parameters (Table IV) of the wheat samples that belong to the same cluster indicate that clusters 1a and 1b possess several superior quality traits (Stab, SD, QN, gluten index [37°C], W, PV, and maximum viscosity [C3]) compared with the other three clusters, which were formed mainly from the other two cultivars with lower Glu 1 than Pobeda and Gordana. The detected positive influence of HMW-GS composition (Glu 1 score) on quality traits is in accordance with the results that other authors have obtained (Horvat et al 2006;Oury et al 2010). Additionally, the mean values of the technological parameters show that similarity between these two clusters (1a and 1b) is predominantly characterized by farinograph, extensigraph, amylograph, and alveograph properties (Table IV) and that difference is caused by some mixolab properties (Table IV) (elasticity, starch retrogradation [C5], gelling range [C5 -C4], and a).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the mean values of the technological parameters (Table IV) of the wheat samples that belong to the same cluster indicate that clusters 1a and 1b possess several superior quality traits (Stab, SD, QN, gluten index [37°C], W, PV, and maximum viscosity [C3]) compared with the other three clusters, which were formed mainly from the other two cultivars with lower Glu 1 than Pobeda and Gordana. The detected positive influence of HMW-GS composition (Glu 1 score) on quality traits is in accordance with the results that other authors have obtained (Horvat et al 2006;Oury et al 2010). Additionally, the mean values of the technological parameters show that similarity between these two clusters (1a and 1b) is predominantly characterized by farinograph, extensigraph, amylograph, and alveograph properties (Table IV) and that difference is caused by some mixolab properties (Table IV) (elasticity, starch retrogradation [C5], gelling range [C5 -C4], and a).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…5). The detected positive influence of HMW-GS composition (Glu 1 score) on quality traits is in accordance with the results that other authors have obtained (Horvat et al 2006;Oury et al 2010). The dendrogram shows that four cultivars investigated in two production years (2011 and 2012) at four localities grouped into clusters at different levels only when an outlier formed by one sample of Apache (produced at Sremska Mitrovica in 2012 at the distance 600) was eliminated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The P and TEP content varied between 12.17 % and 16.08 % and 754 AU and 1075 AU, respectively. The results of the linear correlation analyses (P<0.05) carried out on the proteins data showed that P and TEP content were highly significantly correlated (r=0.914) (Figure 1) similar to Wiser et al (1998), Horvat et al (2006) and Tsilo et al (2010). P and TEP were significantly negatively correlated with AG and positively with GLI components and HMW.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Divana as Croatian standard for the highest quality has a distinct position on Figure 2 due to the highest P (16.08 %) and HMW (10.81 %) and the lowest AG (12.21 %). In our previous studies this cultivar was also characterized by the highest P and HMW proportion (Horvat et al, 2006(Horvat et al, , 2013. Cultivar Olimpija, which is also characterized by excellent bread-making properties, is more distant than cv.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The influence of wheat protein fractions on dough rheological properties and end use quality of wheat has been the subject of numerous studies that included the use of sodium dodecil sulphate polyacrilamid gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) [3][4][5], capillary electrophoresis [6], electrophoresis on chip [7] or high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [4,[8][9][10][11] for fractioning of wheat proteins by their molecular weights.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%