2015
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/ssp.237.136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Geometrical Features of Material Defects on the Identification Level by the Eddy Current Method

Abstract: The article presents the results of the influence of geometrical features of defects in materials on the level of identification by the eddy current method. The study involved the inner ring of the tapered roller bearing. Four test defects, located at a constant distance from the inner surface, and a subsurface marker defect were performed in the treadmill of the tested ring. The test defects had a constant cross-sectional area in a perpendicular direction to the surface of the eddy current head. The geometric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is of great engineering significance to improve the crack detection capability of bearing rings and promote their quality [2]. At present, the defect detection methods for bearing rings include magnetic particle testing [3,4], eddy current testing [5,6], magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing, ultrasonic testing [7,8], and machine vision testing [9][10][11]. MFL testing is widely used to evaluate various ferromagnetic materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is of great engineering significance to improve the crack detection capability of bearing rings and promote their quality [2]. At present, the defect detection methods for bearing rings include magnetic particle testing [3,4], eddy current testing [5,6], magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing, ultrasonic testing [7,8], and machine vision testing [9][10][11]. MFL testing is widely used to evaluate various ferromagnetic materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%