2011
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Foundation Scour on the Dynamic Response of an Existing Bridge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of bridges, most of the work to date has focused on monitoring the superstructure. More recent research has begun to focus on using these damage SoftSoft detection methodologies on sub-structural elements (see [5][6][7]). In these cases, the analyses can be quite sensitive to the soil stiffness assumed in the design where the dynamic oscillations typically remain in the small-strain region.…”
Section: Dynamic Soil-structure Interaction (Dssi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of bridges, most of the work to date has focused on monitoring the superstructure. More recent research has begun to focus on using these damage SoftSoft detection methodologies on sub-structural elements (see [5][6][7]). In these cases, the analyses can be quite sensitive to the soil stiffness assumed in the design where the dynamic oscillations typically remain in the small-strain region.…”
Section: Dynamic Soil-structure Interaction (Dssi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods rely on the well-established statistical concepts instead of human expertise to extract features that change with the onset of damage [37], which eliminates possible individual biases and requires very few assumptions regarding the physical structure. This method is represented by the Auto-Regressive (AR) family method such as the AR or Auto-Regressive Moving Average (ARMA) models [37][38][39][40], AR model with exogenous inputs (ARX) [41,42], Auto-Regressive Moving Average Vector (ARMAV) model [43], vector autoregressive (ARV) models [44], and the time frequency autoregressive moving average (TFARMA) model [45]. The ARMA or other similar models are used to model the time-domain vibration signals obtained from the structure, and then the model coefficients estimated using statistical methods are used to identify the system dynamic parameters and to extract features that indicate the damage occurrence.…”
Section: Data-based Statistical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they suggest a method for creating soil-springs using correlations to geotechnical site data such as shearwave velocities and cone penetration tests. Foti and Sabia [19] describe an investigation carried out on a five-span bridge adversely affected by scour during a major flood. Prior to a planned retrofit, one of the pier responses was monitored to ascertain if scour could be detected by utilising the asymmetric (rigid-body) dynamic behaviour of the pier and analysing foundation acceleration signals.…”
Section: Indirect Monitoring Of Bridge Scour By Identifying Changes Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of authors [6,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] shows that there is a general agreement that changes in natural frequency offer potential as a method to remotely detect and monitor the presence of scour around a foundation element. However, to date no research has been undertaken into using changes in natural frequency as a method to locate a scour hole (i.e.…”
Section: Overview Of Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%