1988
DOI: 10.2307/3172948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Formalization on the Organizational Commitment and Work Alienation of Salespeople and Industrial Buyers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
92
0
6

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
92
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Relatively higher formalization is a typical characteristic in organizations operating in high power distance cultures. Michaels et al (1988) found that there is no negative reaction to a formalized work environment. They also suggest that higher levels of formalization reduce the role ambiguity and role conflict within the organization.…”
Section: Journal Of Management Researchmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Relatively higher formalization is a typical characteristic in organizations operating in high power distance cultures. Michaels et al (1988) found that there is no negative reaction to a formalized work environment. They also suggest that higher levels of formalization reduce the role ambiguity and role conflict within the organization.…”
Section: Journal Of Management Researchmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hunt et al, 1985;Chonko, 1986;Michaels et al, 1988;Ingram et al, 1989;Johnston et al, 1990;Brown and Peterson, 1993;Singh et al, 1996). Their general findings suggest that committed salespeople give more adequately of their time, energy, talent, judgment, ideas, and moral courage in the best interests of the company (Stewart, 1961).…”
Section: Affective Organizational Commitment and Adaptive Sellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, when investigating its causes, alienation is linked to individual differences and to structural predictors: Some researchers posited that alienation can result from low-self-esteem (Heaven & Bester, 1986), reduced self-efficacy (Marshall, Michaels, & Mulki, 2007) or need for achievement (Barrick, Mount, & Strauss, 1993). Others pointed out the role of structural predictors, such as role stressors (Michaels, Cron, Dubinsky, & Joachimsthaler, 1988), job characteristics (e.g. feedback or autonomy, Banai & Reisel, 2007;Hackman & Oldham, 1980) or work context (e.g.…”
Section: Correlates Of Work Alienationmentioning
confidence: 99%