2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10898-014-0184-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of ensemble surrogate models and sampling strategy on the solution quality of algorithms for computationally expensive black-box global optimization problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conejo et al (2013) develop a method which uses local quadratic models of the objective function for problems with a known convex feasible region. General constrained CDFO problems have been studied by Caballero and Grossmann (2008) and Sankaran et al (2010) using local kriging models for the objective and constraints; Powell (1994Powell ( , 2013a developed the COBYLA algorithm which uses local linear approximations for the unknown objective and the unknown constraints which is an approach revisited recently by March and Willcox (2012); Conn and Le Digabel (2013) employ quadratic models for the objective and constraints; Müller et al (2013) use radial-basis function models; and finally Müller and Shoemaker (2014) use an ensemble of various surrogate-models to best fit the objective and constraints of the problem. A recent extension of the BOBYQA algorithm for mixed variable programming has been published which uses quadratic approximations and local integer search, with guaranteed identification of locally optimal points (Newby and Ali, 2014).…”
Section: Model-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conejo et al (2013) develop a method which uses local quadratic models of the objective function for problems with a known convex feasible region. General constrained CDFO problems have been studied by Caballero and Grossmann (2008) and Sankaran et al (2010) using local kriging models for the objective and constraints; Powell (1994Powell ( , 2013a developed the COBYLA algorithm which uses local linear approximations for the unknown objective and the unknown constraints which is an approach revisited recently by March and Willcox (2012); Conn and Le Digabel (2013) employ quadratic models for the objective and constraints; Müller et al (2013) use radial-basis function models; and finally Müller and Shoemaker (2014) use an ensemble of various surrogate-models to best fit the objective and constraints of the problem. A recent extension of the BOBYQA algorithm for mixed variable programming has been published which uses quadratic approximations and local integer search, with guaranteed identification of locally optimal points (Newby and Ali, 2014).…”
Section: Model-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Müller and Piché (2011) introduced one such combination based on Dempster-Shafer theory, and Müller and Shoemaker (2014) parallelized it by adding random sampling similar to that of Regis and Shoemaker (2007b). RosalesPerez et al (2013) have experimented with an ensemble of SVM surrogates each with a different hyperparameters, and found good performance for the NSGA-II evolutionary multiobjective algorithm.…”
Section: Multiple Surrogatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regis andShoemaker (2007, 2013) also use RBF models and new function evaluation points are selected by a stochastic method. Müller and Piché (2011) developed a framework for automatically computing ensembles of various surrogate model types and Müller and Shoemaker (2014) extended the study to investigate the influence of different sampling strategies on the solution quality. Here for the first time we apply a state-of-the-art RBF surrogate optimization algorithm to the problem of land surface emissions of methane and describe the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%