2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-016-0710-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Early Onset of Alcohol Use on the Development of Adolescent Alcohol Problems: a Longitudinal Binational Study

Abstract: This study examined cross-national similarities in a developmental model linking early age of alcohol use onset to frequent drinking and heavy drinking and alcohol problems 1 and 2 years later in a binational sample of 13-year-old students from 2 states: Washington State, United States, and Victoria, Australia (N = 1,833). A range of individual, family, school, and peer influences were included in analyses to investigate their unique and shared contribution to development of early and more serious forms of alc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Substance use was identified as a barrier to PrEP use among 39.4% of stimulant (i.e., crack/cocaine and methamphetamine) users and 16.4% of alcohol users in prior research, 60 and HIV-negative GBM who used substances reported the deleterious effects of alcohol and club drugs (e.g., methamphetamine) on their PrEP adherence. 61 Despite the plausibility of substance use negatively affecting PrEP adherence, published evidence remains unclear. Stimulant users were more likely to have sub-optimal levels of Tenofovir drug concentrations compared to non-users in the iPrEx open-label extension study, 62 yet researchers associated with the PATH-PrEP cohort found differences in PrEP adherence among stimulant users by the number of CAS partners reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substance use was identified as a barrier to PrEP use among 39.4% of stimulant (i.e., crack/cocaine and methamphetamine) users and 16.4% of alcohol users in prior research, 60 and HIV-negative GBM who used substances reported the deleterious effects of alcohol and club drugs (e.g., methamphetamine) on their PrEP adherence. 61 Despite the plausibility of substance use negatively affecting PrEP adherence, published evidence remains unclear. Stimulant users were more likely to have sub-optimal levels of Tenofovir drug concentrations compared to non-users in the iPrEx open-label extension study, 62 yet researchers associated with the PATH-PrEP cohort found differences in PrEP adherence among stimulant users by the number of CAS partners reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite evidence of declining alcohol consumption among Australian adolescents during the past decade [1][2][3], in 2014 9% of 16 year old and 17% of 17 year old school students reported drinking at risky levels for short-term harm (5+ standard drinks on one occasion) during the previous week [2]. Adolescent drinking has been associated with a range of acute [4][5][6] and longer term harms [7][8][9] including negative impacts on the developing brain [5,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characterizing these pathways will inform our understanding of how genetic risk unfolds across time, and the nature of malleability of associated outcomes as a function of intervention. Information about genetic risk, and the intermediary behavioral phenotypes mapped to genetic risk, may prove useful in making decisions about which children are likely to be responsive to which interventions (Dick, 2017). …”
Section: Post-gwas Areas Of Exploration From a Developmental Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%