2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of directional strength-to-stiffness on the elastic–plastic transition of fcc polycrystals under uniaxial tensile loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here grains with a high directional strength-to-stiffness ratio will yield later than grains with a low directional strength-to-stiffness ratio leading to higher lattice strains in the former grains [37]. Defining (i) the directional strength of a particular crystallographic orientations or fibre as the Taylor factor calculated in the fully developed plasticity regime, and (ii) the directional stiffness as the elastic modulus of that fibre in the elastic regime, Wong and Dawson [37] 15 demonstrated that for fcc polycrystals with high elastic anisotropy (A ≥ 2), the {200} and {111} grains have the highest and lowest directional strength-to-stiffness ratio, respectively. It follows that the {111} grains are the first to yield whereas the {200} grains yield last.…”
Section: Diffraction Elastic Constant Lattice Strains and Residual Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here grains with a high directional strength-to-stiffness ratio will yield later than grains with a low directional strength-to-stiffness ratio leading to higher lattice strains in the former grains [37]. Defining (i) the directional strength of a particular crystallographic orientations or fibre as the Taylor factor calculated in the fully developed plasticity regime, and (ii) the directional stiffness as the elastic modulus of that fibre in the elastic regime, Wong and Dawson [37] 15 demonstrated that for fcc polycrystals with high elastic anisotropy (A ≥ 2), the {200} and {111} grains have the highest and lowest directional strength-to-stiffness ratio, respectively. It follows that the {111} grains are the first to yield whereas the {200} grains yield last.…”
Section: Diffraction Elastic Constant Lattice Strains and Residual Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3a). In other words, the evolution of the lattice strains in the elastic regime is dictated by the elastic anisotropy such that it follows the relative magnitude of the directional elastic modulus [37].…”
Section: The Evolution Of Lattice Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plastic deformation starts within grains whose orientation, relative to the loading axis, facilitates the easy activation of their dislocation slip systems when the critical resolved shear stress is reached; other oriented grains, which are plastically hard, will respond to the load elastically and sustain more loads leading to stress redistribution among the grains. In the case of uniaxial tensile loading, the plastically deformed grains accumulate a compressive intergranular strain, whereas the grains lying along the plastically hard orientations accommodate a tensile intergranular strain 10,13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, iron and its alloys are among the most anisotropic body-centred cubic metals, for instance, o1114 is the stiffest orientation that is B2.2 times as strong as the most compliant o1004 orientation 11 . As such, in response to loading, differently oriented NFA grains will sustain distinctly different elastic strains and thus generate intergranular strains to maintain compatibility with its neighbouring grains 10,12 . Plastic deformation starts within grains whose orientation, relative to the loading axis, facilitates the easy activation of their dislocation slip systems when the critical resolved shear stress is reached; other oriented grains, which are plastically hard, will respond to the load elastically and sustain more loads leading to stress redistribution among the grains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation