2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of different surface treatments on the interfacial adhesion of graphene oxide/carbon fiber/epoxy composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be observed that the peaks of CO and CO shifted to higher values. This was mainly due to that the acid treatment process may introduce an increase in fiber surface energy, and the exposure of TiO 2 leading to the decrease of carbon on the surface for BT/C NFs, which was in accordance with O 1s spectrum.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It could be observed that the peaks of CO and CO shifted to higher values. This was mainly due to that the acid treatment process may introduce an increase in fiber surface energy, and the exposure of TiO 2 leading to the decrease of carbon on the surface for BT/C NFs, which was in accordance with O 1s spectrum.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…As shown in Figure S5 (Supporting Information), all of the characteristic peaks in the FT‐IR spectrum were the same except for the peak located at 1715 cm −1 which was assigned to COOH. This illustrated that acid treatment enhanced the hydrophilicity of the T/C NFs . The hydrophilicity was further confirmed by contact angle testing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that NaOH treatment effectively modified the microstructure of BFs due to hydrolysis and peeling reactions. The increased surface roughness facilitated the mechanical interlocking between BFs and EP matrix [15,41]. The mechanical strength of the 2 wt.% NaOHmodified BFs/EP composite is better than that of the untreated, which shows that the hydrogen bonding interaction is the main factor to improve its interface properties.…”
Section: Morphological Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One should note that KH550 treatment resulted in strong chemical bonding between BFs and EP matrix (mechanism as shown in Figure 3). In addition, the layered agglomerates on BFs surface improve the surrounding contact region and enhance the molecular interaction between BFs and EP matrix [41]. Consequently, compared with the hydrogen bonding, the strong chemical bonding of two-phase polymer effectively enhances the mechanical properties of the composite.…”
Section: Mechanical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%