2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of deposition strategy and heat treatment on mechanical properties and microstructure of 2319 aluminium WAAM components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the tensile test results show that the mechanical properties of the as-deposited alloy are very close for the samples prepared at two different printing speeds, but those of the T6-treated sample prepared at the printing speed of 600 mm min −1 are significantly better than those of the sample prepared at the printing speed of 1200 mm min −1 . This result is mainly associated with the smaller average length and higher number density of θ” phase in the sample prepared at the printing speed of 600 mm min −1 as compared with those in the sample prepared at the printing speed of 1200 mm min −1 , which could result in better strengthening effect [37,38]. Moreover, the tensile test results of the T6-treated samples (Figure 6) also show that the anisotropy of the mechanical properties is more significant as compared to that of the as-deposited samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the tensile test results show that the mechanical properties of the as-deposited alloy are very close for the samples prepared at two different printing speeds, but those of the T6-treated sample prepared at the printing speed of 600 mm min −1 are significantly better than those of the sample prepared at the printing speed of 1200 mm min −1 . This result is mainly associated with the smaller average length and higher number density of θ” phase in the sample prepared at the printing speed of 600 mm min −1 as compared with those in the sample prepared at the printing speed of 1200 mm min −1 , which could result in better strengthening effect [37,38]. Moreover, the tensile test results of the T6-treated samples (Figure 6) also show that the anisotropy of the mechanical properties is more significant as compared to that of the as-deposited samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 shows the layout of the tensile testing specimens. Anisotropy is critical in layer-by-layer processes [ 46 ]. In this case, all specimens were cut in the same direction, as shown in Figure 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precipitation hardening consisted of solution annealing, quenching and aging (Figure 1(b)). Conventional solution annealing for this type of steel is typically done at 1038°C/1 h [14], however it has been reported that WAAM-specific microstructure requires custom heat treatment parameters [22]. Therefore, to find the optimal parameters for WAAM, solution annealing was done at three different temperatures (1040°C; 1105°C; 1170°C) and three different times (0,5 h; 1,5 h; 2,5 h).…”
Section: Heat Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be emphasised that special phenomena occur during WAAM, and therefore resulting material properties vary greatly from both: conventionally manufactured parts and parts made with other AM technologies [20]. Solution heat treatment parameters for 15-5 PH are known for traditionally manufactured PH steels [21], however WAAM-specific microstructure typically requires different heat treatment parameters [22]. Guo et al [23] investigated the effect of solution heat treatment of 15-5 PH WAAM samples on hardness, microstructure and tensile strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%