2020
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.01053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Delayed Conductance on Neuronal Synchronization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transition of neuronal single-cell firing patterns can emerge as a sum of different sources. In this framework, topology properties, such as the number [ 18 , 19 ], the type [ 20 ], the intensity of neuronal interactions [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], and the time delay of chemical transmission [ 26 , 27 ], can contribute to the firing patterns transitions. Besides that, noise input currents, as well as external perturbations, can also play a role in the spike and burst transitions [ 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition of neuronal single-cell firing patterns can emerge as a sum of different sources. In this framework, topology properties, such as the number [ 18 , 19 ], the type [ 20 ], the intensity of neuronal interactions [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], and the time delay of chemical transmission [ 26 , 27 ], can contribute to the firing patterns transitions. Besides that, noise input currents, as well as external perturbations, can also play a role in the spike and burst transitions [ 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, they facilitate the degree and direction of information transmission throughout the brain. However, one must not forget that despite having a system of efficient connectivity among neurons, conduction delays along their axonal branches remain their major drawback in terms of computational speed [114]. Therefore, the network of inhibitory neurons will need to work cooperatively in order to compel targeted populations of excitatory neurons to do that as well.…”
Section: Insights From Evoked Oscillations For Emotion Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time delay in the conductance of the pre-synaptic neuron k (g k ) assumes d exc = 1.5 ms for excitatory and d inh = 0.8 ms for inhibitory connections (Borges et al, 2020). The influence of delayed conductance on neural synchronization was studied in Protachevicz et al (2020). There are no spike activities in the time interval…”
Section: The Aeif Model With Neural Autapses and Network Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies reported that excitatory synapses facilitate neural synchronization (Borges et al, 2017;Breakspear et al, 2003), while inhibitory synapses have an opposite effect (Kada et al, 2016;Ostojic, 2014;Protachevicz et al, 2019). The time delay related to excitatory and inhibitory synapses influences the neural synchronization (Gu and Zhou, 2015;Protachevicz et al, 2020). Further on, there is a strong research interest in the investigation of how excitatory and inhibitory synapses influence synchronization in neural networks (Ge and Cao, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%