The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Abstract 5 This paper considers the role that microseismic ground displacements may play in fracturing 6 rock via cyclic loading and subcritical crack growth. Using a coastal rock cliff as a case 7 study, we firstly undertake a literature review to define the spatial locations that may be prone 8 to microseismic damage. It is suggested that microseismic weakening of rock can only occur 9 in 'damage accumulation zones' of limited spatial extent. Stress concentrations resulting from 10 cliff height, slope angle and surface morphology may nucleate and propagate a sufficiently 11 dense population of microcracks that can then be exploited by microseismic cyclic loading. 12We subsequently examine a 32-day microseismic dataset obtained from a coastal cliff-top 13 location at Staithes, UK. The dataset demonstrates that microseismic ground displacements 14 display low peak amplitudes that are punctuated by periods of greater displacement during 15 storm conditions. Microseismic displacements generally display limited preferential 16 directivity, though we observe rarely occurring sustained ground motions with a cliff-normal 17 component during storm events. High magnitude displacements and infrequently experienced 18 ground motion directions may be more damaging than the more frequently occurring, 19 reduced magnitude displacements characteristic of periods of relative quiescence. As high 20 magnitude, low frequency events exceed and then increase the damage threshold, these 21 extremes may also render intervening, reduced magnitude microseismic displacements 22 ineffective in terms of damage accumulation as a result of crack tip blunting and the 23 2 generation of residual compressive stresses that close microcracks. We contend that damage 24 resulting from microseismic ground motion may be episodic, rather than being continuous 25 and in (quasi-)proportional and cumulative response to environmental forcing. A conceptual 26 model is proposed that describes when and where microseismic ground motions can operate 27 effectively. We hypothesise that there are significant spatial and temporal limitations on 28 effective microseismic damage accumulation, such that the net efficacy of microseismic 29 ground motions in preparing rock for fracture, and hence in enhancing erosion, may be 30 considerably lower than previously suggested in locations where high magnitude 31 displacements punctuate 'standard' displacement conditions. Determining and measuring the 32 exact effects of microseismic ground disp...