2022
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.1014906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of COVID-19 restrictions on student satisfaction with undergraduate pathology teaching in an Australian University

Abstract: IntroductionAlmost three years into the COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to reflect on student perceptions of online teaching, and more specifically, if mobility restrictions imposed as public health measures significantly influenced how students perceived online teaching. The aim of this study was to investigate if student perceptions of teaching quality of undergraduate courses would differ when evaluated at times of increasing or relaxing COVID-related mobility restrictions.MethodsWe compared student feed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors employed active listening (Carla & Roberto, 2014), design thinking (Deitte & Omary, 2019) and double-loop learning (Argyris & Schön, 1974) approaches during the teaching period to enhance the reciprocity of the partnership. At the end of every teaching period, student partners were invited to an informal discussion (qualitative) about the partnership experience and all students were invited to complete a standardised course evaluation survey exploring course satisfaction (Rodrigo et al, 2022). The data was analysed by comparing mean differences of student satisfaction ratings to the same course without the student partner program in prior year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors employed active listening (Carla & Roberto, 2014), design thinking (Deitte & Omary, 2019) and double-loop learning (Argyris & Schön, 1974) approaches during the teaching period to enhance the reciprocity of the partnership. At the end of every teaching period, student partners were invited to an informal discussion (qualitative) about the partnership experience and all students were invited to complete a standardised course evaluation survey exploring course satisfaction (Rodrigo et al, 2022). The data was analysed by comparing mean differences of student satisfaction ratings to the same course without the student partner program in prior year.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global shift to online learning presented the opportunity to understand the influences of student engagement (Hews et al, 2022;Rodrigo et al, 2022). An educational interface framework reported by Kahu and Nelson (2018) explained how the shift to online education affected students' perceptions of learning and engagement (Kahu and Nelson, 2018).…”
Section: Educational Interface Framework and Student Wellbeing Within...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pandemic-related stressors or a "lifeload," including economic, employment, family, social, or health pressures, that students would experience, in turn, would result in emotions related to anxiety and negatively affected engagement. This issue coincided with and resulted in a change to forced online learning, a combination that has been demonstrated to lead to reduced wellbeing (Bartolic et al, 2022;Guppy et al, 2022;Hews et al, 2022;Rodrigo et al, 2022). These lifeload stressors in combination with emotions such as a sense of belonging would take a toll on student mental health, which would result in lifeload triumphing "learning load."…”
Section: Lifeloadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings offered recommendations to enhance online teaching in the post-pandemic era. Meanwhile, Rodrigo et al (2022) assessed the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on student satisfaction, revealing that teaching quality was significantly better during periods of increased restrictions. The study emphasized the need for adaptive teaching methods during times of mobility constraints.…”
Section: Students' Perceptions Of Online Learning Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%