2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Class V preparation on in vivo temperature rise in anesthetized human pulp during exposure to a Polywave® LED light curing unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very limited information is available in the literature regarding in vivo pulpal temperature increase in human teeth exposed to light-curing units. Two recent in vivo studies by Zarpellon et al 11) and Runnacles et al 12) found that most commonly used curing-light exposure times did not cause a higher temperature increase than the threshold value of 5.5°C on human premolars using the same control light-curing unit in this study, Bluephase 20i. Only when an unrestored deep class 5 preparation was exposed to a significantly longer light-curing time (60 s) and significantly greater radiant exposure of (73.9 J/cm 2 ) did the pulpal temperature increase reach 5.5°C 11) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Very limited information is available in the literature regarding in vivo pulpal temperature increase in human teeth exposed to light-curing units. Two recent in vivo studies by Zarpellon et al 11) and Runnacles et al 12) found that most commonly used curing-light exposure times did not cause a higher temperature increase than the threshold value of 5.5°C on human premolars using the same control light-curing unit in this study, Bluephase 20i. Only when an unrestored deep class 5 preparation was exposed to a significantly longer light-curing time (60 s) and significantly greater radiant exposure of (73.9 J/cm 2 ) did the pulpal temperature increase reach 5.5°C 11) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Two recent in vivo studies by Zarpellon et al 11) and Runnacles et al 12) found that most commonly used curing-light exposure times did not cause a higher temperature increase than the threshold value of 5.5°C on human premolars using the same control light-curing unit in this study, Bluephase 20i. Only when an unrestored deep class 5 preparation was exposed to a significantly longer light-curing time (60 s) and significantly greater radiant exposure of (73.9 J/cm 2 ) did the pulpal temperature increase reach 5.5°C 11) . In this study, the greatest increase in pulpal temperature was produced by the Valo light-curing unit (4.00°C) with an extended curing time of 20 s and radiant exposure of 50.3 J/cm 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One could state that exposure modes delivering radiant exposure values between 20 and 70 J/cm 2 should be added to the sequence of EMs used in the current study, so a more reliable regression analysis could be obtained. However, a recent in vivo study evaluating PT increase in human premolars with Class V preparations observed similar relationship between radiant exposure values and PT rise 21 . In that study, another EM delivering a radiant exposure of approximately 37.3 J/cm 2 was tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The participants were seen between March and April, 2013. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were based on previous in vivo studies, 19 21 and included (1) treatment plans indicating premolar extractions for orthodontic reasons, (2) the presence of healthy, intact, non-carious, and non-restored, fully erupted treatment teeth, and (3) patients with well-controlled health conditions that allowed all procedures involved in the research to be performed with minimal risk. Exclusion criteria included (1) patients who did not agree to volunteer for the study, (2) patients not meeting all of the inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%